1
$\begingroup$

Hi, I'm trying to calculate the efficiency for the Brayton Cycle. The end result is supposed to be:

$$ \eta = \frac{C_p(T_3-T_4) - C_p(T_2-T_1)}{C_p(T_3-T_2)}$$

Where the denominator is from $Q_h$.

However, when I calculate $Q_h$, I also get a component from work:

$$ dQ_h = C_p dT + pdV$$

$$ Q_h = C_p(T_3-T_2) + p_{max}(V_3-V_2)$$

Why are you able to ignore the work component when calculating the added heat?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

What you are considering heat given in your question is actually a wrong form of the internal energy change equation, $dU=C_p dT-pdV$(in this case, not +pdV). The work component and the added heat are separate entities which combine to give the change in internal energy . The added heat in this case is only $C_p dT$. Hence, the work component doesn't come into play.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.