180° refraction

If possible, How many combination between the numbers of the different layers and the thickness of each layer will give me 180° refraction.

  • $\begingroup$ What are your ideas about an answer to you problem? $\endgroup$ – Farcher Jan 22 '17 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ what type of glass? $\endgroup$ – user140434 Jan 22 '17 at 5:37
  • $\begingroup$ That looks like 180° not 360° $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jan 22 '17 at 6:34
  • $\begingroup$ But you get 360 from two sets back to back. White layers on the outside, black on the inside. $\endgroup$ – mmesser314 Jan 22 '17 at 7:03
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean to describe a dichroic mirror? That isn't done exactly by refraction, rather by wavelength-dependent multiple reflections. $\endgroup$ – Whit3rd Jan 22 '17 at 7:23

Yes, what you need is for the light to be totally internally reflected at some point. You can't achieve this just with refraction because refraction can only make the incoming ray parallel to the interface and not bend it back. So you need to reflect the ray at some point. For this you need the incoming angle (angle to the normal) at one of your sheet boundaries to be greater than the critical angle:

$$ \theta_i \gt \arcsin\left(\frac{n_2}{n_1}\right) $$

So you need to choose the upper sheets to deflect the light ray towards the horizontal, i.e. to increase the incoming angle, then one last sheet to totally internally refract it.

However note that you still can't achieve a complete 180° turnaround. That's because if the incoming light is exactly normal to your sheets of glass it won't be refracted at all. You need the incoming angle of incidence to be great than zero, and that means the outgoing angle will also be greater than zero. Your turnaround will always be less than 180°.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.