I am confused as to when does an annihilation operator annihilate its creation operator counter-part.

As an intro to second quantisation in my QFT notes we have:

The operators $c_j$ annihilate their counterparts and for this we require that: $c_{j_1}c_{j_2}^\dagger |0\rangle =\delta_{j_1 j_2} |0 \rangle$

Doesn't this mean that an operator $\hat c_{j_1} \hat c_{j_1}^\dagger = 1$? Or do we require the $|0\rangle$ to be able to say that?

I guess that would imply that annihilation may only happen when the term is a state rather than an operator? e.g. $\hat c_{j_1} \hat c_{j_1}^\dagger |0\rangle = |0\rangle$ vs $\hat c_{j_1} \hat c_{j_1}^\dagger = \hat c_{j_1} \hat c_{j_1}^\dagger$

I am asking this question because I am dealing with fermions on sites, and I was curious whether an operator such as $f_j f^\dagger_j$ would simply "collapse" or "annihilate" to 1.

  • $\begingroup$ Are these specifically Fermion operators, or are you asking about the Boson case too? $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Jan 20 '17 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielSank sorry i removed "number operator" out, I generally mean any operator $\endgroup$ – Zeeshan Ahmad Jan 20 '17 at 3:04

Isn't the order for the number operator you listed incorrect? Doesn't the creation operator lie to the left of the annihilation operator?

Edit: You didn't mention if you are talking about fermions or bosons. For fermions, that isn't the number operator.

Either way, you only showed that it equals 1 when when acting on the vacuum state. To show that it is equal to one always, you have to show that it equals 1 on a basis of the space (so, for every state.)

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ So say you have a general operator $c c^\dagger$. Will this term always collapse to one? $\endgroup$ – Zeeshan Ahmad Jan 20 '17 at 3:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't think so. For bosons, $\hat{c}_{i}\hat{c}_{i}^{\dagger}|n_{1},....n_{i},....>$ will give $ n_{i}|n_{1},....,n_{i},.....>$. For fermions, it will give |0> if state i had a particle, and it will give back the original state if state i didn't have a particle. $\endgroup$ – Ben S Jan 20 '17 at 3:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Saw an update for this due to an upvote. I believe my previous comment should have $n_{i}+1$ and not $n_{i}$. $\endgroup$ – Ben S Aug 3 '18 at 3:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.