Why is a nonzero VEV for a spinor field said to break Lorentz invariance? Consider a spinor field $\psi(x)$. Its vacuum expectation value is given by $$v=\langle 0|\psi(x)|0\rangle.$$ Using the fact that the vaccum is invariant under Lorentz transformation, we get, $$v=\langle 0|\psi(0)|0\rangle.$$ Why is it that, if $v\neq 0$, the Lorentz invariance is broken?
 A: The $v$ you write is itself a spinor, not a scalar. A non-zero spinor is obviously not invariant under Lorentz transformations, so a non-zero spinorial VEV breaks Lorentz invariance of the 1-point function.
A: To make ACM's argument more explicit, consider
\begin{align}
v&=\langle 0|\psi|0\rangle\\
&=\langle 0|\overbrace{UU^\dagger}^1\psi\overbrace{UU^\dagger}^1|0\rangle\\
&=\overbrace{\langle 0|U}^{\langle 0|}\overbrace{U^\dagger\psi U}^{D_\Lambda \psi}\overbrace{U^\dagger|0\rangle}^{|0\rangle}\\
&=D_\Lambda v
\end{align}
where $U=U(\Lambda)$ is the unitary operator that corresponds to Lorentz transformations in the Hilbert space, and $D_\Lambda$ its representation in the space of spinors.
Considering $\Lambda$ to be, say, a rotation around the $z$ axis with angle $\theta$, and expanding to first order in $\theta$, we get
$$
S^zv=0
$$
which is impossible for  representations of the Lorentz Group with half-integer spin, as $S^z$ has eigenvalues
$$
-j,-j+1,\cdots,+j
$$
none of which is zero.
Therefore, we must conclude that $U(\Lambda)$ doesn't exist, that is, the Lorentz symmetry is broken.
