1
$\begingroup$

I have an operator $\hat{O}=e^{i s (\hat{a}^\dagger+\hat{a})}=e^{i2s\hat{x}}$, where $\hat{a}^\dagger, \hat{a}$ are the creation/annihilation operators (or $\hat{x}$ is the real quadrature operator) for the SHO with real $s$, operating on a coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$. The result should be a coherent state $|\beta\rangle$ possibly with some complex phase, but I am unsure how to complete the calculation.

In other words, I have $\hat{O}|\alpha\rangle=e^{i\phi}|\beta\rangle$, and I am trying to compute $\phi,\beta$ with no luck so far.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Have you learned about displacement operators? If you recognize that $\hat{O}$ is a displacement operator, then you can use some displacement operator identities to understand how $\hat{O}$ acts on $|\alpha\rangle$. $\endgroup$ – Harry Levine Jan 13 '17 at 6:26
  • $\begingroup$ You could try and calculate $\hat a \left( \hat O |\alpha \rangle \right)$. $\endgroup$ – Noiralef Jan 13 '17 at 12:21
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking about trying to frame $\hat{O} $ as a displacement operator, but the fact both operators have the same sign in the exponential would seem to make that difficult $\endgroup$ – QtizedQ Jan 13 '17 at 14:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just reexamined the definition of the displacement operator and realized it doesn't include the $i$ in the exponential, which means the displacement operator approach should work. Thank you for bringing that up, it's been a little while since I did quantum optics. $\endgroup$ – QtizedQ Jan 13 '17 at 14:48
  • $\begingroup$ Had the same exact double-take when comparing $\hat{O}$ to the definition of the displacement operator. Nice one! $\endgroup$ – Harry Levine Jan 13 '17 at 23:58
1
$\begingroup$

$\hat{O}$ is actually an instance of the displacement operator $D(\beta)=e^{\beta\hat{a}^\dagger-\beta^*\hat{a}}$ with $\beta=is$. From here, $\hat{O}|\alpha\rangle$ is easy to compute by utilizing some common identities associated with the displacement operator.

We will use $|\alpha\rangle=D(\alpha)|0\rangle$, where $|0\rangle$ is the $n=0$ number state. Additionally, we we use $D(\alpha)D(\beta)=D(\alpha+\beta)e^{\frac{\alpha\beta^*-\alpha^*\beta}{2}}$

If we apply these identities, we find (where $\text{Re}(\cdot)$ is the real part of $\cdot$)

$$D(is)|\alpha\rangle = D(is)D(\alpha)|0\rangle = e^{i \text{Re}(s\alpha)}D(is+\alpha)|0\rangle=e^{i \text{Re}(s\alpha)}|is+\alpha\rangle$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.