0
$\begingroup$

I see the following formula when reading a textbook on quantum optics:

$$g(u)=\int f(\alpha)\, e^{\alpha^*u-\alpha u^*} \, \mathrm d^2\alpha,$$

$$f(\alpha)=\frac{1}{\pi^2}\int g(u)\, e^{\alpha u^*-\alpha^*u}\, \mathrm d^2u.$$

The book defines them as 'Fourier transforms in the complex plane.' Are there any proofs or justifications of them?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Might this question be better suited for Mathematics as there is no relevant physical context given? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 9 '17 at 14:29
3
$\begingroup$

You have $i\Im (\alpha^*u) = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha^*u - u^*\alpha)$ from complex calculus; remember $$z-z^* = (a+ib)-(a-ib) = 2ib.$$ Therefore, the exponent is purely imaginary. The integration element $\mathrm d^2\alpha$ means that you have to integrate over the real part of $\alpha$ and over its imaginary part.

Substitute $\alpha = \alpha_R+i\alpha_I,u=u_R+iu_I$ and compute $\Im(\alpha^*u)$. This will give you a two-fold Fourier integral, one is over $\alpha_R$ and another is over $\alpha_I$. The second Fourier integral is the inverse transformation; it can be proven analogously.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Normally when we do a 2D fourier transform, we only deal with a function of, say, $x$ and $y$. But now $f(\alpha)=f(\alpha_R+i\alpha_i)$. There is an $i$ hanging around. Also is $d^2\alpha=d\alpha_R+i d\alpha_i$? How to change this back to the usual $dxdy$? I don't know how to make these two changes from the original definition of Fourier transform involving only real numbers. $\endgroup$ – Physicist Jan 9 '17 at 15:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is d^2 \alpha = d \alpha_R d \alpha_I $\endgroup$ – kryomaxim Jan 9 '17 at 15:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.