Considering an action dependent on vierbeins $e_I^a$ and the Riemann curvature tensor $R_{KL}^{ab} = (d \omega^{ab}+ \omega^{ac} \wedge \omega_c^{b})_{KL}$ given by

$$S = \int_M d^4x \det(e) e_I^ae_J^b \epsilon_{KL}^{IJ}F_{ab}^{KL}.$$

Variation by the vierbein would yield zero and together with the condition $d e^{a}+ \omega^{ab} \wedge e_b:= \nabla e^a = 0$ ($\nabla$ is exterior covariant derivative) I would obtain a boundary term after partial integration that looks like

$$S = \int_M d^4x \det(e) \nabla^K (e_I^ae_J^b \epsilon_{KL}^{IJ} \omega_{ab}^L) = \int_{\partial M} d^3x n^K e_I^ae_J^b \epsilon_{KL}^{IJ} \omega_{ab}^L.$$

Is this calculation correct?

Now I guess that this quantity describes the topological degree of the map $G: \partial M \rightarrow P$ with the Poincare group $P$. Since I insert Maurer-Cartan forms $e_I^a = \partial_Ix^a, \omega_{ab}^L = (g^{-1})_a \partial^L g_b$ for tertrad and spin connection I think will obtain $\deg(G)$. Is my idea right?

And is known which topological invariants this topological term yields?


The Holst term equals to zero on-shell because its equations of motion is Bianchi identity not because it is total derivative. You can find details in Rovelli & Vidotto 's book.

  • $\begingroup$ When does this topological Holst term plays a role (Examples?)? $\endgroup$ – kryomaxim Feb 14 '17 at 13:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @kryomaxim There are some investigations on such question. For example arxiv.org/abs/0903.2270 $\endgroup$ – Saksith Jaksri Feb 15 '17 at 8:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.