The Lagrangian of the Yang-Mills fields is given by \begin{align} \mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu\nu}~ F_a^{\mu\nu} +\bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu})\psi- m~ \psi \bar{\psi} \end{align}


\begin{align} D_\mu \psi = \partial_\mu \psi - i g~ t^a_{ij}~ A_\mu^a~ \psi\\ F_{\mu\nu}^a = \partial_\mu A^a_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a + i g f^{abc} A^b_\mu A_\nu^c \end{align}

I try to get the Noether current here: so starting by the equations of motions:

$ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial\psi} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\psi)} = 0 ~~~~~~~~~~(1)\\ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial\bar{\psi}} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\bar{\psi})} = 0~~~~~~~~~(2) \\ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial A_\mu} - \partial_\nu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\nu A_\mu)} = 0 ~~~~~~~(3)\\ $

These yield:

$ g \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu A_\mu^a - m \bar{\psi} -i \partial_\mu \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu = 0~~~~~~~~(4)\\ g \gamma^\mu A_\mu^a \psi - m \psi = 0~~~~~~~~~~~(5)\\ g\bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu t^a_{ij} \psi_j + g f^{abc} A^b_\nu F^{c~\mu\nu}= \partial_\nu F^{a~ \nu \mu}~~~~~~~~(6) $

Clearly (6) is the right equation of motion of the Yang Mills theory with a conserved current : $J^{a~ \mu} = g\bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu t^a_{ij} \psi_j$ , see for instance Peskin's book Equation(15.51) . Now I have extra terms in (4) and (5) what's wrong I made?


The current is just the LHS of your eq. $(6)$. In fact, the antisimmetry of $F^{\mu \nu}$ implies $\partial _\mu \partial _\nu F^{\mu \nu}=0$.

Observe that the gauge fields carry a non-zero charge, since they transform non-trivially under global transformations. In fact, they transform according to the adjoint representation of the group of simmetry. The part of the current which involves only $\psi$ is the covariant current $\mathscr J ^\mu$, which enters in:$$D_\mu F^{\mu \nu} =\mathscr J ^\nu.$$ This current (differently from the Noether current $J^\mu$) transforms like the Yang-Mills tensor under gauge transformations.


You have forgotten to add the term

$i\partial_\mu\psi \gamma^\mu$

in (5).

Equation (4) is correct. Note that $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + iA_\mu$.

  • $\begingroup$ so $ \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu})\psi = \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu})\psi + \psi(i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu})\bar{\psi}$ ? I just thought $\partial_\mu$ act only on $\psi$. Even so what will happen for Equ (4) and (5) ? shouldn't they added to get the sum on all the equations of motions of the three field $\psi,\bar{\psi}, A_\mu$ ? $\endgroup$ – S.S. Jan 6 '17 at 13:23
  • $\begingroup$ The Version for the Fermion kinetic action $\bar{\psi}i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi + \psi i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \bar{\psi}$ can also be used; it is naturally a hermitean quantity. The Version given in your question is valid if and only if $\int d^4x \partial_\mu(\bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi)=0$ (fermion number conservation) is satisfied. $\endgroup$ – kryomaxim Jan 6 '17 at 14:39
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, why then Equs. (4), (5) and (6) has been added to get the final equation of motion ? it seems now (4) and (5) have been subtracted . $\endgroup$ – S.S. Jan 6 '17 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ This kinetic action I considered in my comment is only an alternative Lagrangian density; not an equation of Motion. $\endgroup$ – kryomaxim Jan 6 '17 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, i don't get it. what I mean is when we got three equations of motions due to the three fields in the Lagrangian $\psi,\bar{\psi}, A_\mu$ , why only the last one Equ. (6) kept as the right final equation of motion of the Lagrangian while (4) and (5) in my solution have disapered ? $\endgroup$ – S.S. Jan 6 '17 at 19:14

In the Lagrangian of the question, there is a typo, it should be $\bar{\psi}\psi$ for the last term.

The equation (4) is basically correct except the sign of $i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi$ should be positive. By taking complex conjugate of it , you get the equation of motion as $i \gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu} \psi - m \psi =0$.

The equation (5) should be the same when you do a partial integral for the term $\bar{\psi} i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi=i\gamma^{\mu} \partial{\left(\bar{\psi}\psi\right)}- \partial{\bar{\psi} i \gamma^{\mu} \psi}$ and then compute the Euler-Lagrange equation.

The equation (6) is basically correct. It should be $\partial_{\nu} F^{a \nu \mu} + g \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} t^a \psi + i g F^{c \mu \nu} f^{abc} A^b_{\nu}=0$.

There are two equations of motion in total for two fields, which makes sense.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.