11
$\begingroup$

The compact U(1) lattice gauge theory is described by the action $$S_0=-\frac{1}{g^2}\sum_\square \cos\left(\sum_{l\in\partial \square}A_l\right),$$ where the gauge connection $A_l\in$U(1) is defined on the link $l$. I was told that this theory in 2+1D spacetime is dual to a U(1) XY model on the dual lattice, described by the following action $$S_1=-\chi\sum_l \cos\left(\sum_{i\in\partial l}\theta_i\right)-K\sum_i\cos(\theta_i),$$ where the XY variable $\theta_i\in$U(1) is defined on the dual site $i$. It was said that the K term in the action is to take into account the instanton effect in the compact U(1) lattice gauge theory (which I don't understand). However when I tried to derive the the dual theory, I arrived at the following integer XY model (or height model?) $$S_2=-\chi\sum_l \cos\left(\sum_{i\in\partial l}m_i\right),$$ with the integer variable $m_i\in\mathbb{Z}$ defined on the dual site $i$. Because the Pontryagin dual group of U(1) is simply $\mathbb{Z}$ but not U(1), so I believe that the U(1) gauge theory $S_0$ should dual to an integer XY model $S_2$, and this duality is exact. But every book or paper that I have encountered did not mention anything about $S_2$, instead they all point to the U(1) XY model $S_1$. Therefore I was forced to conjecture that the integer XY model is equivalent to the U(1) XY model with additional K term. Can anyone tell me if my conjecture is correct or not? How to go from $S_2$ to $S_1$ (or maybe directly from $S_0$ to $S_1$)? How is the K term being added? What is the physical meaning of the K term?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Very interesting question. Could you briefly comment on how you derived $S_2$ from $S_0$, and how $\chi$ and $m_i$ are related to $g$ and $A_l$? $\endgroup$ – Heidar Jun 17 '12 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ Could you elaborate on the derivation of S2? $\endgroup$ – pathintegral May 18 '18 at 20:36
2
$\begingroup$

Let't me give it a shot. One possible explanation is to imagine we soften the integer condition for $m$'s in $S_{2}$. Then, the cosine term in $S_{1}$ is what we want to add because when $K$ is large, it enforce the integer condition and go back to $S_{2}$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It is dual to a model of integer spins on the dual lattice sites. See for instance Savit. The duality is between continuous compact variables and discrete integer variables. The dual partition function is $$ Z = \sum_{\{m \} } \prod_{x^{*}, \mu} I_{m - m'}\left( \beta \right) $$ Where the product is over dual links (plaquettes of the original lattice) and the $m$s live on the dual sites. the difference $m - m'$ is the difference between integer values at adjacent dual sites. $\beta = 1/g^2$ and the sum is an unconstrainted sum over the integers at each dual site.

To derive this expand the Boltzmann weight in a Fourier series and integrate out the gauge fields. Then solve the constraint on the integer variables associated with the plaquettes of the original lattice.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.