0
$\begingroup$

I am not sure what I am doing wrong here or if I have made some wrong assumptions, however my intuition is contrasting with my mathematical result.

I am considering a case where there are two speakers opposite each other, separated by a distance $R$. They are in phase and produce waves of the same amplitude $a_0$. So they produce waves of the form $a_0 \cos (\omega t) $.

If I place a detector between them and a variable distance r away from one of the speakers, I get that detected waves from one speaker are of the form $$a_0 \cos \left(\omega t -\frac {\omega r}{c} \right) $$ and from the other is $$a_0 \cos \left(\omega t -\frac {\omega (R-r)}{c} \right) \, .$$

Now this gives me a standing wave when I consider the case of R being fixed and varying r only, and I considered where the phase diffeence between the waves detected was $2n\pi$ for constructive interference and $(2n+1)\pi $ for destructive. This gave me the expected result, so my expressions for the waves seem to work here.

However I am stuck when I considered varying the distance between the speakers $R$. Intuitively, I would think that if the distance between the speakers is $(n+1/2)\lambda $ everywhere, then the waves at each point between the speakers would be in antiphase and would cancel. However when I looked at this mathematically, I thought: is there an $R$ for which

$$-\frac {\omega r}{c})=\frac {\omega (R-r)}{c})+(2n+1)\pi $$ independent of $r$. Thinking about it now, this is actually the exact same equation I used to find where the nodes are in the standing wave, and that was at particular values of $r$. It seems from this equation that there is no distance between the speakers for which the waves are in anti-phase everywhere.

This goes against my intuition. I'm not sure which is right.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I fixed some of the math typesetting here but there's still an obvious error in the third equation. Please fix it. Also, there's no actual question in this post. Please as a specific, well defined question :) $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Dec 26 '16 at 0:57
0
$\begingroup$

"if the distance between the speakers is (n+1/2)λ ... then the waves at each point between the speakers would be in antiphase"

The maths is $$R=(n+1/2)λ$$

Trying to resolve it by equating phase angles is not necessary. focus on the total distance including that odd half wavelength to give a $\pi$ phase shift.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.