2
$\begingroup$

As voltage is given to primary coil, current flows through coil and consequently magnetic flux changes. Due to change in magnetic flux a back emf is also induced in the primary which opposes the applied voltage. Thus applied voltage =- induced EMF, i.e. $$V_p=E+IR \, ,$$ and if $R=0$ then $V_p=E$. If an equal and opposite back emf gets induced then how does change of flux takes places through iron core? Shouldn't it suppress the applied voltage completely?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Change of flux happens whenever current changes in time. It does not require the voltage to be greater than induced EMF. In the ideal case $R=0$, the EMF has the same magnitude as voltage and opposite effect than applied voltage. This does not mean that current won't flow or change; resistance is zero so current will flow even net motive force inside wires is zero. Current will still change according to Faraday's law. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 17, 2020 at 0:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

A back EMF is generated but where did you learn that the back voltage from this EMF is exactly "equal" to the applied voltage? The back EMF is proportional to the time rate of change in the magnetic flux and since the magnitude of the magnetic flux and its rate of change depends, for instance, on what material is inside the coil, it's apparent that the back voltage depends on the details of the coil design and cannot always just be exactly equal to the applied voltage, isn't it?

Read what this article says about Lenz' Law:

The direction of current induced in a conductor by a changing magnetic field due to Faraday's law of induction will be such that it will create a field that opposes the change that produced it.

The law doesn't say that the back voltage is equal to the applied voltage, only that the back voltage will act to oppose the increase in magnetic flux (which is proportional to the electrical current).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It's written in our textbook. That If R=0 Then Vp=E.(i.e suppose resistance is negligible ) And From this conclusion turns ratio equation has been derived(in our book) in this way: applied voltage =- induced EMF Vp=-(-Np del.(flux)/del.(time) ) Vp=+Np del(flux)/del(time).....(i) Then EMF induced across secondary= Ns del(flux)/del(time)....(ii) Dividing (ii) by (i) we get transformation ratio as Vs/Vp=Ns=Np. $\endgroup$
    – Saqeeb
    Commented Dec 25, 2016 at 9:53
  • $\begingroup$ @FanBoy - If the secondary coil is attached to a zero resistance (i.e., it is short-circuited, R=0), and IF the transformer is a perfect transformer with 100% efficiency, then I believe that that's correct that the back voltage will be equal to the applied voltage. $\endgroup$
    – user93237
    Commented Dec 25, 2016 at 16:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.