1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that we have a very, very large cubic box (with the edge much larger than the absolute value of $c$) which is completely empty. Now, suppose that we add in there a small sphere with some charge $q$ in one of the vertices. Will the electric field suddenly appear on the entirety of the box or it will "travel", expanding from the vertex at speed $c$? The same question applies to a magnetic field.

I thought about this while playing with some magnets. Suppose that, at the middle point of the box we have a wall, made of some material. If the magnetic field "travels", will the material change the intensity of the field on the other side? When i was playing with 2 magnets today, i noticed that both magnets would attract each other even when separated by a $3\operatorname{cm}$ thick block of wood. However, in a $0.5 \operatorname{cm}$ thick window glass, the magnets would not attract each other. To sum up, here are the two questions:

Does magnetic/electric field "travel" trough out space?

Does this imply that a material on the way might change the intensity of the field?

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "with the edge much larger than the absolute value of $c$" is a nonsensical statement because edge lengths are not measured in velocity units. $\endgroup$ – David Z Dec 21 '16 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ That's why i said "absolute value". $\endgroup$ – embedded_dev Dec 21 '16 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ That doesn't matter. Saying "absolute value" does nothing to address that problem. The absolute value of a velocity is still a velocity. $\endgroup$ – David Z Dec 21 '16 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not an native english speaker. In my language when we say "absolute value" thats what we mean: the value, just the numeric value. Thank you for noticing it. I think i should have wrote "numerically bigger". $\endgroup$ – embedded_dev Dec 21 '16 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, well the English terminology you want is "numeric value". For example, given a value of "-20 m/s", the numeric value is "-20", the unit is "m/s", and the absolute value is "20 m/s". In any case, none of these are valid measurements of an edge length, so the statement is still nonsensical. $\endgroup$ – David Z Dec 21 '16 at 23:43
2
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes on both points.

Electromagnetic radiation travels with speed c in the vacuum. Therefore both components, magnetic and electric travel with this speed.

You cannot perceive it with 'naked eye' it is too fast to see.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.