5
$\begingroup$

What does the two-point position space function of massive scalars look like in Minkowski space?

$$\langle 0| \phi(x) \phi (y)|0\rangle =\ ?$$

I've been trying to better understand the analytic behavior of some simple correlators and realized I don't quite know how to write down such a function. Is there a closed form which I can learn about its poles, cuts, etc.?

Usually when discussing such objects authors will just write this as a Fourier transform of momentum space, $D(x,y)=\langle 0| \phi(x) \phi (y)|0\rangle =\int e^{-i p(x-y)} D(p)$, without actually evaluating the Fourier transform. I'm worried I am missing some subtleties when I try to do it myself. Other authors will argue that if we think about the physics, we should really be concerned with causal objects and so we should consider a related object like $\langle0| [\phi(x), \phi (y)]|0\rangle $. (For example Peskin & Schroeder pp. 27-29)

This seems like a basic object so I am assuming I have some very basic misunderstanding. The only time I ever see such an object discussed in physics is when dealing with a CFT. Here, however, one is always interested in a massless theory (we don't need no scales!).

Edits:

  1. One suggestion is just to use this procedure, but I believe the starting point there involves a time-ordered correlation function (i.e. Feynman propagator). I'm specifically interested in the non-time-ordered case.
  2. Another suggestion is that I should be careful about my language. This seems the providence of Wightman functions and more general distributions in field theory, but alas this is not my forte.
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Although that is known as the 2 point function, it doesn't mean that it is a "function" in the proper sense. This is unfortunate terminology, as Wightman functions are tempered distributions in each of the "variables". $\endgroup$
    – Phoenix87
    Dec 19, 2016 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ I had an inkling I should have been using the language of more generalized distributions, Wightman functions, but wasn't sure I was on the right track. $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Dec 19, 2016 at 21:47
  • $\begingroup$ AccidentalFourierTransform: I had already been through that post and unfortunately I don't think it answers my question. There they show that one can take the position space Feynman propagator, take the massless limit, and they recover the result for a massless propagator. The starting point, Feynman Propagator, is defined for a time-ordered product. I'm specifically interested in the correlator without time ordering. $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Dec 19, 2016 at 21:50
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform No problem! Indeed, I ended up reading through a whole boat load of similar responses like that thinking "gah my question must have been asked before!" $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Dec 19, 2016 at 21:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is done in Eqn(71) in arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9908140 Given in terms of BesselK. May be I should post this as a comment. I haven't check it. Hope this hope helps. $\endgroup$
    – user168471
    Sep 7, 2017 at 9:32

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

These sorts of expressions are discussed in older quantum field theory books, such as Bjorken & Drell and Bogoliubov & Shirkov. In Quantum Fields, by Bogoliubov & Shirkov, the expression for the two-point function of a massive scalar field in Minkowski spacetime can be read from the expressions given on Appendix V.2. Specifically, one has (up to typos as I copy down the expression) $$\langle 0 | \phi(x) \phi(0) |0 \rangle = \frac{\mathrm{sign}(x^0) \delta(\lambda)}{4\pi i} - \frac{m \Theta(\lambda)}{8 \pi i \sqrt{\lambda}}\left[\mathrm{sign}(x^0) J_1(m \sqrt{\lambda}) - i N_1(m \sqrt{\lambda}) \right] + \frac{m \Theta(-\lambda)}{4 \pi^2 \sqrt{-\lambda}} K_1(m \sqrt{-\lambda}),$$ where $\lambda = (x^0)^2 - ||\vec{x}||^2$, $J_1$, $Y_1$, and $K_1$ are the Bessel functions, $\Theta$ is Heaviside's theta function, and $\mathrm{sign}$ is the sign function.

There are some discussions about this and other related propagators on n-Lab. n-Lab also lists this table on commutator functions and propagators that might be useful to understand the pole structures and so on.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.