1
$\begingroup$

Let $S$ and $S'$ be two frames, moving with velocity $V$ relative to each other. Treat $S$ as a stationary frame, then $S'$ moves away with velocity $V$. Let $\gamma = 7$ so that $\Delta t = 7\Delta t'$. Does this mean that if there are exact clocks in each frame and observers in $S$ establish a video conference call with observers in $S'$, then the clock in $S'$ will show time moving seven times slower?

I don't think that's going to be the case because we can treat things the other way around by taking $S'$ as stationary.

But then, what about time dilation? How should it happen in this case? Will clocks in $S$ and $S'$ differ at all?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That's basically the classical twin paradox, which is answered here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2554/… If both observers continue to move relative to each other with constant velocity, the two observers will never meet and can't compare the clocks. One of the two observers has to accelerate to meet again with the other observer and that acceleration isn't relative. Also note that the signal from the video chat can only travel at the finite velocity $c$ $\endgroup$ – Jannik Pitt Dec 11 '16 at 20:54
  • $\begingroup$ See relativity of simultaneity perhaps. $\endgroup$ – IntuitivePhysics Dec 11 '16 at 20:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ sequence: "observers in [inertial frame] $S$ [...] observers in [inertial frame] $S'$" -- +1 for your use of "observer" as being associated to any one individual constituent of a reference frame (to any individual "material point"); i.e. consistent with the use by Einstein; especially in "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Ann. Phys. 17, (1905); rather than being associated to all constituents of a reference frame collectively, or to even more remote abstractions. $\endgroup$ – user12262 Dec 13 '16 at 6:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Tatsu Takeuchi's diagram on the matter (from his book An Illustrated Guide to Relativity and reproduced in another stack exchange post) gives a nice visual way to understand this problem. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Dec 15 '16 at 1:36
1
$\begingroup$

1) Suppose Alice sits on earth while Bob travels away at speed $v$.

2) First do everything in Alice's coordinates: Bob is traveling along the line $x=vt$. Alice, at time $t_0$, sends him a light signal that travels along the line $x=t-t_0$. To see when it arrives, solve $x=vt=t-t_0$ to get $$t={t_0\over 1-v}\qquad x={vt_0\over 1-v}$$

3) Now Lorentz-transform to Bob's coordinates. This gives $$t'={t-xv\over\sqrt{1-v^2}}={t_0(1+v)\over\sqrt{1-v}^2}$$

4) Therefore the speed of the video stream arriving at Bob's ship is slowed down by a factor of $(1+v)/\sqrt{1-v^2}$. This factor is not just your $\gamma$, because that fails to account for the fact that Bob is moving away from Alice as the video streams.

5) By symmetry, exactly the same is true of the speed of the video stream arriving at Alice's screen from Bob's ship.

6) As to your (separate) question about whether Bob's and Alice's clocks differ, that depends, of course, on who you ask. Alice says Bob's runs slower than hers, Bob says Alice's runs slower than his, and Ted, who is moving away from Alice in the same direction as Bob at speed $v/2$, says they don't differ at all.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

IMHO you cannot compare tick rate of two single clocks in different frames by means of video call. It is often omitted that "an observer" in SR is not a human being, who turns his head left and right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_(special_relativity) You have to do the following: In your reference frame S you have to put (at least) two clocks in different spatial positions. Then you have to synchronize these clocks, and to keep to Einstein synchronization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation Then, when a single clock in motion passes by one of these clocks in IMMEDIATE VICINITY, you take readings. When the single clock in motion passes by second clock in immediate vicinity, you take readings again. You will conclude, that single clock in motion dilates. For the reference frame S' you have to do the same procedure. Thus, we can say a single clock dilates relative to a set of a spatially separated clocks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ pstcc.edu/departments/natural_behavioral_sciences/Web%20Physics/… $\endgroup$ – Albert Dec 12 '16 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ pstcc.edu/departments/natural_behavioral_sciences/Web%20Physics/… $\endgroup$ – Albert Dec 12 '16 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ chapter Time Dilation, sentence highlighted in red $\endgroup$ – Albert Dec 12 '16 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ The Einstein synchronization procedure is used because it is transparently acceptable, but it does not represent the only way to make such measurements, and a single observer can make them with the correct equipment and understanding. You 'just' need to get the range (as measured in your own frame) from every observation (perhaps using a phased array or other synthetic aperture detector system) and then allow for the retardation of the signal in order to reconstruct the correct space-time point for each observed event. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Dec 15 '16 at 1:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I think we can also look at source through a tube transversely to direction of it's motion and measure it's frequency. $\endgroup$ – Albert Dec 15 '16 at 9:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.