0
$\begingroup$

I have a problem with energy conservation in the neutron capture process. As far as I understood the matter, elements heavier than iron can not be produced in a fusion process, because after ion, heavier nuclei have more energy per nucleon than lighter nuclei. And that is why the heavier elements are produced in neutron capture processes.

Now I have read, that a neutron capture process looks like this:

$$^A_ZX+n~~~\rightarrow~~~ ^{A+1}_ZX +\gamma $$

But that means, that not only has the nucleus on the right side of the equation more energy than nucleus and neutron on the left side combined, but on the right side there is also energy in the form of gamma ray. To me that looks like energy is missing. Is that right?

If that is right, does the energy come from outside (fusion processes in the star, supernova)? And if that is the case, why is the neutron capture process possible but fusion of heavy elements is not?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any specific reaction where you see a problem when you calculate the energies? $\endgroup$ – Pieter Dec 5 '16 at 18:03
1
$\begingroup$

Let us suppose that the nucleus $^{A+1}_Z\rm X$ has larger rest mass than $^A_Z\rm X + n$. Then $^{A+1}_Z\rm X$ can relax to a lower-energy state by emitting a neutron, and is beyond the neutron drip line.

You're correct that nuclides around iron and nickel have the largest binding energy per nucleon. However, a free neutron has an especially low binding energy per nucleon, being both unbound and unstable. So in general, neutron capture on stable or near-stable nuclei increases the average binding energy per nucleon on average over the entire system.

In fact, it's neutron capture (near the valley of stability, in the "s-process", and far from the stable isotopes in the "r-process") that is responsible for production of all elements heavier than iron.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, thanks for the answer. I think I'm beginning to understand. So on average a free Neutron and a heavy nucleus $^A_ZX$ have not as much binding energy combined, as the even bigger nucleus $^{A+1}_ZX$ after the capture, even if $^A_ZX$ has a bigger binding energy per nucleon than $^{A+1}_ZX$? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Dec 5 '16 at 20:28
  • $\begingroup$ But this means, that the "production" of free Neutrons for example in the supernova does absorb a lot of energy, doesn't it? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Dec 5 '16 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ Wikipedia says that the neutrons in the slow (s) neutron-capture process mostly come from alpha-capture on carbon-13 and on neon-22. Both of those reactions are exthermic, just rare. In a core-collapse supernova, you're correct that the neutron production does absorb energy from the gravitational collapse of the star. $\endgroup$ – rob Dec 7 '16 at 1:34
1
$\begingroup$

Neutron capture drives iron-peak nuclei away from the valley of stability, so the nucleus that is produced has less binding energy per nucleon and is not as stable. In the slow neutron capture process (s-process), one or more neutron captures are usually followed by a beta decay, which moves the nucleus back towards the valley of stability, but now with an extra proton. In the rapid, high neutron flux r-process, then multiple neutron captures can take place before decay back towards the stability line.

The reason this works can be seen with an example. Consider this ($n,\gamma$) reaction. $$ ^{56}_{26}{\rm Fe} + n \rightarrow ^{57}_{26}{\rm Fe} + \gamma$$ Using this semi-empirical mass formula calculator, I find that $^{56}_{26}{\rm Fe}$ has a binding energy per nucleon of 8.762 MeV and a total binding energy of 490.68 MeV. On the other hand $^{57}_{26}{\rm Fe}$ has a binding energy per nucleon of 8.728 MeV and a total binding energy of 497.48 MeV.

Thus although the binding energy per nucleon is smaller in the product nucleus, the total binding energy is larger. If we consider only the rest mass of the neutron then the total mass-energy on the LHS of the reaction is 53030.91 MeV, whilst on the RHS it is 53024.26 MeV. Thus there is an excess of available mass-energy that is carried off by the gamma photons and/or in the respective kinetic energies of the particles.

A side issue is that the statement that a particular A/Z ratio is the most stable depends on the density and environment of the material. For example in the collapsing core of a pre-supernova star, electron degeneracy blocks beta decay and pushes the equilibrium to more neutron-rich nuclei and this aids neutron capture.

Finally, the reason why neutron captures can occur at a significant rate (in the presence of a high enough neutron flux) but that fusion reactions do not, is that (neutral) neutrons do not suffer the coulomb repulsion that prevents the initiation of alpha capture and other fusion reactions.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You're using "endothermic" here in a way that I don't like. Production of free neutrons by photoproduction on a nucleus or by electron capture on protons is endothermic. But there are plenty of exothermic reactions with a free neutron in the final state, and those are responsible for s-process neutrons. And neutron capture on most nuclides releases several MeV of photons, which isn't endothermic either. There's a difference between decreasing the binding energy per nucleon and decreasing the total binding energy; you can't take a bunch of exothermic steps and call the result endothermic. $\endgroup$ – rob Dec 7 '16 at 1:49
  • $\begingroup$ @rob Correct - the produced nucleus is less stable, but the overall reaction is not endothermic. Edit in progress. $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Dec 7 '16 at 12:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.