On the same spirit of this unanswered question I am proposing this question which I have been trying for some time now. Here I'm working with dimension $n = 4$ (identifying $\mathbb H = \mathbb R^4$) considering the principal $SU(2)$-bundle with $\rho : SU(2) \to GL(2, \mathbb C)$ being the adjoint representation $ad_g (A) = g^{-1} A g$, for all $g \in SU(2)$ and $A \in \mathfrak {su}(2)$. Moreover, the gauge potential is written (in local coordinates) as $\mathcal A = \mathcal A_{\alpha} dx^\alpha$, $\alpha = 1,2,3,4$ and its gauge field strength (curvature) is given by $$\mathcal F = d\mathcal A + \frac{1}{2}[\mathcal A, \mathcal A] = \frac{1}{2} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} dx^\alpha \wedge dx^\beta$$ where (after some lengthy calculation) $$\mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} = \partial_\alpha \mathcal A_\beta - \partial_\beta\mathcal A_\alpha + [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta]\ \ , \ \ \beta= 1,2,3,4$$ where $\partial_\alpha = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\alpha}$.


Derive the Euler-Lagrange equations of the Yang-Mills functional given by $$\mathcal {YM} (\mathcal A) = \frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb R^4} \|\mathcal F\|^2 d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4})$$ such equations are called in the physics literature Yang-Mills equations $$\ast d^{\mathcal A}(\ast \mathcal F) = \sum_{\alpha = 1}^4 (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} + [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}]) = 0$$ where $\ast$ is the Hodge dual operator, $d^\mathcal A$ is the covariant exterior derivative.

Attempt: Since the space of gauge potentials is an affine space we may consider the variations $\mathcal A + t\mathcal B$ (family of 1-parameter of gauge potentials) thus

$$\begin{aligned}\frac{d}{dt} \Big(\mathcal {YM}(\mathcal A + t \mathcal B)\Big)\Big|_{t= 0} &= \frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb R^4} \frac{d}{dt} \Big(\|\mathcal F\|^2\Big)\Big|_{t = 0} d (\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4})\\ &=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb R^4} \|\mathcal F\| \frac{\left\langle \mathcal F, \frac{d}{dt} (\mathcal F)\Big|_{t =0}\right\rangle}{\|\mathcal F\|} d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4})\\&=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb R^4} \left\langle \mathcal F, \frac{d}{dt} (\mathcal F)\Big|_{t=0}\right\rangle d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4})\end{aligned}$$ where

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal F &= \frac{1}{2} \mathcal F_{\alpha \beta} dx^\alpha \wedge dx^\beta \\&= \frac{1}{2}\Bigg( \partial_\alpha (\mathcal A_\beta + t \mathcal B_\beta) - \partial_\beta (\mathcal A_\alpha + t \mathcal B_\alpha) + [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta] \\&+ t [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + t [\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta] + t^2 [\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta]\Bigg) dx^\alpha \wedge dx^\beta\end{aligned}$$ by linearity we then obtain

$$\frac{d}{dt} (\mathcal F)\Big|_{t = 0} = \Bigg(\partial_\alpha \mathcal B_\beta - \partial_\beta \mathcal B_\alpha + [\mathcal A _\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + [\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta]\Bigg) dx^\alpha \wedge dx^\beta$$ Now

$$\begin{aligned}\frac{d}{dt}\Big(\mathcal {YM}(\mathcal A + t \mathcal B)\Big)\Big|_{t = 0} &=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb R^4} \left\langle \mathcal F, \frac{d}{dt} (\mathcal F)\Big|_{t=0}\right\rangle d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4}) \\&= \frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} (\partial_\alpha \mathcal B_\beta - \partial_\beta \mathcal B_\alpha + [\mathcal A _\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + [\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta])d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4}) \end{aligned}$$ Next step should be integration by parts. Then using the fact (Divergence Theorem)

$$\int_{\mathbb R^4} \partial_i (f) g dV_g = - \int_{\mathbb R^4} f \partial_i (g) dV_g $$ and that $\mathcal F_{\beta\alpha} = - \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}$ we have

$$\begin{aligned}\delta\mathcal {YM}(A)&=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb R^4} \left\langle \mathcal F, \frac{d}{dt} (\mathcal F)\Big|_{t=0}\right\rangle d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) \\&= \frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} (\partial_\alpha \mathcal B_\beta - \partial_\beta \mathcal B_\alpha + [\mathcal A _\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + [\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta])d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4})\\&= \frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} (\partial_\alpha \mathcal B_\beta) d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) - \int_{\mathbb R^4}\mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}(\partial_\beta \mathcal B_\alpha) d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4})\right) \\&+ \frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta])d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) \right)\\&= -\frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{\mathbb R^4} 2\mathcal B_\beta (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4})\right) + \frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta]d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) \right)\\&=-\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal B_\beta (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) \\&+ \frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] + \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal B_\alpha, \mathcal A_\beta])d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) \right)\\&=-\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal B_\beta (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) + \int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4})\end{aligned}$$

I need only show that

$$\int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}[\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal B_\beta] d(\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) = - \int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal B_\beta [\mathcal A_\alpha,\mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}]d (\bf {vol}_{\mathbb R^4}) $$

Where do I want to get? $$\begin{aligned}\delta (\mathcal {YM}) (\mathcal A) = - \int_{\mathbb R^4} \mathcal B_\alpha (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} + [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal F_{\alpha \beta} ]) d(\bf vol_{\mathbb R^4})\end{aligned}$$ then the stationary points satisfy

$$\sum_{\alpha = 1}^4 (\partial_\alpha \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta} + [\mathcal A_\alpha, \mathcal F_{\alpha\beta}]) = 0$$


Let me discuss the mathematical precise derivation of the Yang-Mills equation in full generality. For this, let us first of all fix some notation:

  1. Let $P$ be a principal bundle over some (compact, oriented) pseudo-Riemannian manifold $(\mathcal{M},g)$ (spacetime) with structure group given by a compact (and finite-dimensional) Lie group $G$. The corresponding Lie algebra is denoted by $\mathfrak{g}$.
  2. Furthermore, let $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mathfrak{g}}$ be an $\mathrm{Ad}$-invariant inner product on $\mathfrak{g}$, or more generally, a non-degenerate $\mathrm{Ad}$-invariant and symmetric bilinaer form. For example, if $G$ is simple, then this is usually nothing else then a (negative multiple) of the Killing form.

Now, in order to formulate the action of Yang-Mills theory, we first of all take a connection $1$-form $A\in\Omega^{1}(P,\mathfrak{g})$, which corresponds to a gauge field in physics terminology. The corresponding curvature $F^{A}\in\Omega^{2}(P,\mathfrak{g})$ is defined by $$F^{A}=\mathrm{d}A+\frac{1}{2}[A\wedge A].$$ Since we want to define an integral over the spacetime $\mathcal{M}$ and not $P$, we need to translate the curvature to a field defined on $\mathcal{M}$. This can be done in the following way: It is a general mathematical fact that there is the following isomorphism: $$\Omega^{k}_{\mathrm{hor}}(P,\mathfrak{g})^{\mathrm{Ad}}\cong\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P)),$$ where $\Omega^{k}_{\mathrm{hor}}(P,\mathfrak{g})^{\mathrm{Ad}}$ is some subset of $\Omega^{k}(P,\mathfrak{g})$ of forms satisfying extra properties (which are fulfilled by $F^{A}$) and where $\mathrm{Ad}(P)=P\times_{\mathrm{Ad}}\mathfrak{g}$ denotes the "adjoint bundle", which is a vector bundle defined on some certain quotient of $P\times\mathfrak{g}$. (In mathematics, this is a particular case of so-called "associated vector bundles", which can be defined for every principal bundle and every representation $(\rho,V)$ on $G$). As a second ingredient, we have to define an inner product $$\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}:\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))\times\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))\to C^{\infty}(\mathcal{M}).$$ This can be done in the obvious way: Take $\alpha,\beta\in\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$. If we take some local frame $\{e_{a}\}_{a=1}^{\mathrm{dim}(G)}\subset\Gamma(U,\mathrm{Ad}(P))$, which is a family of local sections of $\mathrm{Ad}(P)$, such that they form at each point a basis, then we can write $$\alpha\vert_{U}=\sum_{a=1}^{\mathrm{dim}(G)}\alpha^{a}\otimes e_{a}\hspace{1cm}\text{and}\hspace{1cm}\beta\vert_{U}=\sum_{a=1}^{\mathrm{dim}(G)}\beta^{a}\otimes e_{a},$$ where $\alpha^{a},\beta^{a}\in\Omega^{k}(U)$ are real-valued forms. Using this, we define the iner product by $$\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\vert_{U}:=\sum_{a,b=1}^{\mathrm{dim}(G)}\langle\alpha^{a},\beta^{b}\rangle\langle e_{a},e_{b}\rangle_{\mathfrak{g}},$$ where $\langle\alpha^{a},\beta^{b}\rangle$ denotes just the usual inner product of real-valued forms and where $\langle e_{a},e_{b}\rangle_{\mathfrak{g}}$ has to be understood point-wise. After all this preliminaries, we define the Yang-Mills action via

$$\mathcal{S}_{\mathrm{YM}}[A]:=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\Vert F^{A}_{\mathcal{M}}\Vert^{2}_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\,\mathrm{d}\mathrm{vol}_{g}$$

where $F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}$ is the curvature viewed as an element of $\Omega^{2}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$ via the above isomorphism and where $\mathrm{d}\mathrm{vol}_{g}$ denotes the usual measure on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. In order to derive the equations of motion, we first of all observe that

$$F^{A+t\alpha}=F^{A}+t(\mathrm{d}\alpha+[A\wedge\alpha])+\frac{t^{2}}{2}[\alpha\wedge\alpha]$$ for all $\alpha\in\Omega^{1}_{\mathrm{hor}}(P,\mathfrak{g})^{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}$. As a consequence, we have that $$F^{A+t\alpha}_{\mathcal{M}}=F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}+t(\mathrm{d}_{A}\alpha_{\mathcal{M}})+\mathcal{O}(t^{2}),$$ where $\alpha_{\mathcal{M}}\in\Omega^{1}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$ corresponds to the form $\alpha$ via the isomorphism explained above. As a last ingredient, we need the following fact: $$\int_{\mathcal{M}}\langle\mathrm{d}_{A}\alpha,\beta\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\,\mathrm{vol}_{g}=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\langle\alpha,\mathrm{d}_{A}^{\ast}\beta\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\,\mathrm{vol}_{g}$$ for all $\alpha\in\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$ and for all $\beta\in\Omega^{k+1}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$, where $$\mathrm{d}^{\ast}_{A}:\Omega^{k+1}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))\to\Omega^{k}(\mathcal{M},\mathrm{Ad}(P))$$ denotes the codifferential. This formula is basically an extension of the well-knwon theorem for real-valued forms, that states that the exterior derivative is formally self-adjoint to the codifferential with respect to a suitable $L^{2}$-inner product, to bundle-valued differential forms. Using this, we get that $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\mathcal{S}_{\mathrm{YM}}[A+t\alpha]=2\int_{\mathcal{M}}\,\langle\mathrm{d}_{A}\alpha_{M},F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\,\mathrm{vol}_{g}=2\int_{\mathcal{M}}\,\langle\alpha_{M},\mathrm{d}_{A}^{\ast}F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}\,\mathrm{vol}_{g}\stackrel{!}{=}0.$$ Hence, by non-degeneracy of the inner product, which extends to the inner product $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mathrm{Ad}(P)}$, we get that $$\mathrm{d}^{\ast}_{A}F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}=0.$$ Using the definition of the codifferential, this is equivalent to say that $$\mathrm{d}_{A}\ast F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}=0,$$ which are the well-known Yang-Mills equation.

As a short comment: It is a general fact that for every connection $1$-form $A$ it holds that $$\mathrm{d}_{A}F_{\mathcal{M}}^{A}=0.$$ This is a particular form of the "Bianchi identity". This equation together with the Yang-Mills equation can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known Maxwell's equations for electrodynamics.

  • $\begingroup$ Just a comment. When you define the curvature form, you use "d" as a notation for the differential, and one understands it as the exterior differential in the De Rham bundle over $\mathcal M$, but it is actually an operator in the principle bundle ("space of gauge fields" in physics). You need to link/project this to the exterior differential somehow. How? $\endgroup$
    – DanielC
    Sep 19 at 21:57
  • $\begingroup$ Oh sorry. In the definition of the curvature form, I wrote $F^{A}=\mathrm{d}A+\frac{1}{2}[A\wedge A]$, where $A\in\Omega^{1}(P,\mathfrak{g})$. In this context, $\mathrm{d}$ is just the usual exterior derivative of vector-valued forms. This is defined coordinate-wise. Take a basis $\{T_{a}\}_{a}$ of $\mathfrak{g}$ and write $A=\sum_{a}A_{a}T_{a}$ where $A_{a}\in\Omega^{1}(P)$. Then $\mathrm{d}A:=\sum_{a}(\mathrm{d}A_{a})T_{a}$. $\endgroup$ Sep 19 at 22:00

Your answer seems to be correct. It may be rewritten as $D_{\mu} F^{\mu \nu}=0$, where $D_{\mu}$ is a covariant derivative in the adjoint representation of the gauge group.

  • $\begingroup$ I still need to show the equality before "Where do I want to get?" $\endgroup$ Dec 2 '16 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ @AaronMaroja I think that the easiest way is to rewrite this expression in terms of gauge indices... $\endgroup$ Dec 2 '16 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ How do you mean? Could you show it briefly in you answer? $\endgroup$ Dec 2 '16 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ I've tried using Jacobi's idendity but didn't get any further. $\endgroup$ Dec 2 '16 at 21:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There’s a trace over the Lie algebra in the action. The equality you’re trying to prove is then true due to cyclicity of the trace. $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Aug 6 '18 at 2:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.