0
$\begingroup$

Is there any system in the universe that is information less, I.e., has or possesses no physical information.

For example if I have a system of particles and if I throw this system into a black hole(BH), I can access the information of the system as long as the system is outside the event horizon, but once it is inside the BH, I can never obtain or retrieve any information about it; but this doesn't imply that the system of particles has become an information-less system. Classically, a black hole is independent of its past history.How does the information of the quantum state of the infalling particles re-emerge in the outgoing radiation?

Hawking in this paper says that:

Polchinski recently used a shock wave approximation to calculate the shift on a gen- erator of the horizon caused by an ingoing wave packet. Even though the calculation may require some corrections, this shows in principle that the ingoing particles determine a supertranslation of the black hole horizon. This in turn, will determine varying delays in the emission of wave packets. The information about the ingoing particles is returned, but in a highly scrambled, chaotic and useless form. This resolves the information paradox. For all practical purposes, however, the information is lost.

Is there any other example of a system possessing no information?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I can think of 1 "system" possessing no information, but this is not the place for politics. Seriously I think you should include a definition of information in your post. $\endgroup$ – user108787 Nov 22 '16 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Lol! Yeah,thanks! I have edited and provided a link which aims to define what I mean by information. $\endgroup$ – Naveen Balaji Nov 22 '16 at 18:38
-3
$\begingroup$

Information is inherant for any system, even a one particle system, as it pertains to relationship not only to Self but to Any other members of the set. There are no non informational systems.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you expand this more, particularly the first sentence (e.g., references to back it up). If you don't, this may be deleted as it has been marked as low-quality $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Nov 23 '16 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps your understanding of the response is of equal quality..... $\endgroup$ – RaSullivan Dec 23 '16 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ Judge and jury..... Everyone has to be righter $\endgroup$ – RaSullivan Dec 23 '16 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ You realize you're posting on a site in which the answers are judged? You are willing that to happen... $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Dec 23 '16 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ Again you miss the spirit of the content $\endgroup$ – RaSullivan Dec 23 '16 at 19:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.