0
$\begingroup$

The $1$-point correlation function in any theory, free or interacting, can be made to vanish by a suitable rescaling of the field $\phi$.


I would like to understand this statement.

With the above goal in mind, consider the following theory:

$$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\left((\partial\phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}\right)+\frac{g}{2}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial_{\mu}\phi.$$

What criteria (on the Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$) is used to determine the value of the field $\phi_{0}$ such that the transformation $\phi \rightarrow \phi + \phi_{0}$ leads to a vanishing $1$-point correlation function $\langle \Omega | T\{\phi(x_{1}\phi(x_{2})\}| \Omega \rangle$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The 1-point function is constant in spacetime because of translation invariance, i.e. $\langle \phi(x)\rangle = \phi_0\in\mathbb{R}$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}^4$. Obviously, the 1-point function of $\phi'(x) := \phi(x) - \phi_0$ is zero since the expectation value is linear. So $\phi\mapsto \phi' = \phi + \phi_0$ gets rid of the non-zero 1-point function. This works for all Poincaré-invariant Lagrangians.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why does translation invariance mean that the $1$-point function is constant in spacetime? Also, what is $\phi_{0}$? Lastly, how can you prove that the shift $\phi\rightarrow \phi'=\phi+\phi_{0}$ does not affect the Lagrangian? $\endgroup$ – nightmarish Nov 17 '16 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ @failexam 1. $\phi_0$ is just the value of $\langle \phi(x)\rangle$. 2. Translation invariance means it's constant because $\langle \phi(x)\rangle = \langle \phi(x+a)\rangle$ (the fields $\phi(x)$ and $\phi(x+a)$ have the same Lagrangian, so the same expectation values). 3. It does affect the Lagrangian, I never said it didn't. After the redefinition, there will be no linear terms in $\phi$ left in it because $\phi_0$ corresponds to the classical minimum of the potential to first order, so the redefinition is equivalent to expanding around the minimum, where linear terms are absent. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Nov 17 '16 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ You first define $\phi'(x)$ in your answer as $\phi'(x)=\phi(x)-\phi_{0}$ but later in your answer as $\phi' = \phi+\phi_{0}$. Is this valid? Also, there may not be a linear term in $\phi$ in the Lagrangian after the transformation of $\phi$, but there's still a new constant term in the Lagrangian. Why won't the new constant term not affect the correlation functions? $\endgroup$ – nightmarish Nov 18 '16 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ @failexam No, that's a typo. Also, of course the redefinition affects the correlation functions - that's the whole points of the redefinition, we did it to make the 1-point function vanish. I don't get what exactly your problem is. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Nov 18 '16 at 14:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.