I have just found this good site for Q&A on physics. What I want to question is about quantum mechanics written by Griffiths, Section 10.2.3 specifically, which is Aharonov-Bohm Effect.

According to the book, The Hamiltonian $H$ can be expressed in term of $\varphi$(Electric potential), $\vec{A}$(Magnetic potential).

$$H = \frac{1}{2m}\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\nabla-q\vec{A}\right)^2+q \varphi$$

and $\vec{A} = \frac{\Phi }{2\pi r}\hat{\phi}$ (you'd better see the book, I think.)

and also $\varphi$ is zero!.

so $$H = \frac{1}{2m}\left[-~\hbar^{2}\nabla ^{2}+q^2A^2+2i\hbar q\vec{A}\cdot\nabla\right]$$

I can't understand why factor 2 is multiplied to the third term. So could someone show me how?

  • $\begingroup$ It's just the square of a sum: $(a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2+2ab$. $\endgroup$ – Javier Nov 15 '16 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. but I will show How I derived it. $(\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown-q\vec{A})^2$ = $(\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown-q\vec{A})\cdot (\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown-q\vec{A})$. =$[-\hbar^2\triangledown^2-\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown\cdot(q\vec{A})-\frac{q\hbar}{i}{}\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown+q^2A^2]$ here look at the second term. it is (ignore the coeffcients) $-q\triangledown \cdot\vec{A}-\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown q$. using gauge condition , the divergence of A is zero, and the gradient of q is zero because it is just a charge(Constant scalar). $\endgroup$ – COMPLEX Nov 15 '16 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ Right, of course, I was a bit too hasty to answer :) $\endgroup$ – Javier Nov 15 '16 at 15:11

To see how to obtain the expression stated in the book, it helps to introduce a 'dummy' wavefunction $\psi$ to keep track of our math:

$$H\psi = \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown-q\vec{A})^{2}\psi$$

Expanding this equation yields:

$$ H\psi = \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown\cdot\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown-\frac{\hbar}{i}\triangledown\cdot(q\vec{A})-q\frac{\hbar}{i}\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown + q^{2}A^{2})\psi$$

$$ H\psi = \frac{1}{2m}(-\hbar^2\triangledown^2 -q\frac{\hbar}{i}\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown + q^{2}A^{2})\psi-\frac{1}{2m}\frac{\hbar}{i}q\triangledown\cdot(\vec{A}\psi)$$

The last term on the right can be expanded as:

$$ \triangledown\cdot(\vec{A}\psi)=\psi\triangledown\cdot\vec{A}+\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown\psi$$

Since the form of the vector potential $\vec{A}$ is given, we can compute the divergence of this potential. In spherical coordinates, it is : $$ \triangledown\cdot\vec{A} = \frac{1}{r \sin \theta }\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}\frac{\Phi }{2\pi r}=0$$

Substituting the expression back into the original equation yields:

$$ H\psi = \frac{1}{2m}(-\hbar^2\triangledown^2 -q\frac{\hbar}{i}\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown + q^{2}A^{2})\psi-\frac{1}{2m}\frac{\hbar}{i}q\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown\psi$$

and after factorizing and removing the 'dummy' wavefunction, we finally arrive at the expression:

$$ H = \frac{1}{2m}(-\hbar^2\triangledown^2 -2q\frac{\hbar}{i}\vec{A}\cdot\triangledown + q^{2}A^{2})$$

  • $\begingroup$ If you want to apply the operator to functions (as you correctly do) you should do it from the very first line. The symbol $\nabla$ stand-alone makes no sense (plus the momentum acts as derivative only if represented on wave functions, otherwise it could be anything else). $\endgroup$ – gented Nov 15 '16 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. That approach is exactly accurate than my approach. It helps me reconsider operators accurately. $\endgroup$ – COMPLEX Nov 21 '16 at 15:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.