0
$\begingroup$

When we use Slater-Koster parameter for tight binding model, we represent hopping integral using direction cosine (l,m,n) and bond intergral $V$.

For example, the energy between s and px orbital is expressed as

$$ E_{s,x} = l V_{sp\sigma} $$

where $l$ is the direction from position of $s$ to $px$ orbital. But for $V_{sp\sigma}$, we have two choices of intergral, below figure (1) and (2). Their values are same, but sign is different. So which one is used when calculating $V_{sp\sigma}$?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You can deduce this by looking at the pictures.

On the left the energy is lower than on the right, because the +-parts repel each other. If you assume $V_{sp\sigma}$ to be positive it is calculated for the right. Then $-V_{sp\sigma}$ applies to the left.

This argument only holds for an isolated molecule (as in your picture). For an crystal you have to extend this thinking. Most tight-binding codes use this parametrization: https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.4519

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.