3
$\begingroup$

I read that photon bunching happens for thermal light within the coherence time of the thermal light. That is, if the time for detection is greater than the coherence time of the thermal light, no bunching is observed.

I also read that atoms of Bose-Einstein condensates are randomly bunched, but they become bunched if they are heated above the critical temperature, and they are bunched only within the coherence length of the matter wave.

Sources: http://www.sciencealert.com/cold-atoms-act-like-laser-beam https://physics.anu.edu.au/news.php?NewsID=13 http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/02/25/3149175.htm?site=indepthfeature&topic=latest http://phys.org/news/2011-02-scientists-atoms-lasers.html

Does this also hold for the Hong-ou-Mandel effect? Do the photons bunch at the same output of the beam splitter only if they arrive together at the beamsplitter within the coherence time?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Yes, the photons need to arrive within the coherence time. The reason, as I understand it, is that if the photons arrive at times that differ by more than the coherence time then the photons are effectively tagged by the time. As a result they become distinguishable and the HOM effect does not work anymore. For this reaosn one always have a trombone in the optical setup to change the path length difference. The HOM dip manifests as a function of this pathlength difference. The function of the dip is directly related to the spectrum of the light.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This is all treated within the multimode description of quantum optics. You end up with photon creation, destruction operators that correspond to a photon in a specific pulse, i.e. operators like

$\hat{a}_\alpha=\int d\omega \alpha\left(\omega\right)\hat{a}\left(\omega\right)$

$\hat{a}^\dagger_\alpha=\int d\omega \alpha\left(\omega\right)^*\hat{a}\left(\omega\right)^\dagger$

Which desribe the single-photon within a very specific wave-packet given by $\alpha$. The spectrum of the amplitude of light (i.e. electric field in some normalized form) due to this wave-packet is $\alpha=\alpha\left(\omega\right)$. It follows that the spectral density of power due to this pulse is $P\left(\omega\right)=\mathcal{F}\left(\alpha\left(t\right)\alpha^*\left(t\right)\right)=\int d\omega' \alpha\left(\omega'-\omega\right)\alpha^*\left(\omega'\right)$.

Also, above we use the single-frequency creation/destruction operators that commute as $\left[\hat{a}\left(\omega\right),\hat{a}\left(\omega'\right)^\dagger\right]=\delta\left(\omega-\omega'\right)$

Now, the HOM effect arrises as a result of the non-vanishing commutator, which in case of multimode light will be:

$I=\left[\hat{a}_\alpha,\hat{a}_\beta^\dagger\right]=\int d\omega \alpha\left(\omega\right)\beta\left(\omega\right)^*$

The above expression is basically the overlap of the pulse $\alpha$ with pulse $\beta$. I have written it in frequency domain, but you could also do it in time domain. Now, what happens in case of incoherent light is that overlap of the light with its delayed version goes to zero (if delay time exceeds coherence time). In classical optics this leads to dissaperance of interference pattern. In quantum optics, you get dissapearance of anti-bunching ($I=0$)

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

As far as I know, the answer is no. Coherence time is a classical concept, whereas Hong-ou-Mandel effect is a quantum interference phenomenon. That's all I can explain with my limited knowledge!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So Dr. Andrew Truscott is wrong? He verified it by experiment. There is no purely classical or purely quantum effect, there is a relationship between the uncertainty in photon number and in the phase of the wave. The more you know about the range of the number of photons, the less certain the phase becomes - delta N * delta phi = 1/2. That is why quantum light is very incoherent. Same with Bose-Einstein condensates, the more localized the atoms are in a optical lattice, the less superfluid the helium becomes because phase uncertainty is increased by the measurement of the atom density. $\endgroup$ – Luparu Dorian Nov 11 '16 at 11:05
  • $\begingroup$ I could extend this comment by saying the more you know about the temporal duration of the pulse E* t = h / 4 pi, the less you know about the frequency. The more you know about the position of a particle, the less you know about the momentum delta p* delta x = h /4pi. There is no measurement that allows you to fully colapse a wavefunction into a particle. A real photon is not a localized particle, it has a non-zero coherence described by a wavepacket. Think of electrons, you cannot contain them in a volume equal to the nucleus of an atom, not even using nuclear forces - they are wavepackets $\endgroup$ – Luparu Dorian Nov 11 '16 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ As I said, my knowledge is very limited in this subject. I understand that saying something is purely quantum or classical is just a way to explain, an interpretation. So my answer is limited to that aspect and not going deep. $\endgroup$ – Kalpak Gupta Nov 15 '16 at 7:22
  • $\begingroup$ Notion of coherence time is mainly coming from statistics. It is equally important to classical (e.g. light waves. Laser outputs) and quantum physics. $\endgroup$ – wcc Feb 4 at 23:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.