Consider two concentric spherical shells of radii $a$ and $2a$ respectively. Let the inner shell have potential $V_0$ and the outer shell be grounded. What is the potential $V(r)$ as a function of the distance to the center of the shells, and what are the charges on the shells?
This is how I would approach the problem. Let $Q_i$ and $Q_o$ be the charge on the inner and outer shell respectively. Put $$V(r) = -\int_{2a}^{r} \vec{E}(r') \cdot d\hat{r}'.$$
Since $E(r) = 0$ for $r < a$,
$E(r) = Q_i/(4\pi\epsilon_0r^2)$ for $a < r <2a$
$E(r) = (Q_i+Q_o)/(4\pi\epsilon_0r^2)$, this gives us
$V(r) = Q_i/(8\pi\epsilon_0a)$ for $r < a$, $V(r) = Q_i(2a/r-1)/(8\pi\epsilon_0a)$ for $a < r < 2a$
$V(r) = (Q_i+Q_o)(2a/r-1)/(8\pi\epsilon_0a)$ for $2a < r.$
Now requiring that $V(a)=V_0$, we get $Q_i = 8\pi\epsilon_0aV_0$. But what about $Q_o?$ From the form of the potential we immediately get $V(2a) = 0$, regardless of the value of $Q_o$.
In the answer to the problem it states that $Q_o = -Q_i$. It is also directly states that $V(r) = 0$ for $r > 2a$, but frankly I don't see why that follows from the assumption that the outer shell is grounded.
Does it all rest on the implicit assumption that $V(\infty) = 0$, which makes my definition of $V(r)$ wrong? Certainly we are not required to make this assumption?