Your question is a very good candidate for considerations in the formalism of relativistic quantum mechanics. What you are pointing to is the uncertainty principle in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Consider the uncertainty relation:
$$\Delta x\Delta p\sim \hbar$$
If $v'$ and $v$ represent the velocities before and after measurement made in a time interval $\Delta t$, we can write
$$\left(v'-v\right)\Delta t\Delta p\sim \hbar$$
If the measurement is made such that both $\Delta t$ and $\Delta p$ both small simultaneously, then $\left(v'-v\right)$ will be very much large. Yes, your measurement of both time interval and momentum simultaneously with accuracy lead to a very large change in the velocity of the particle, a direct consequence of such a measurement. In fact, if the momentum eigen states are not energy eigen states, you can measure both time and momentum simultaneously with accuracy. This will give an infinite increase in the velocity of the particle.
However in the light of special relativity, there exists a speed limit $c$. This restriction on the speed limit of the particle will give you the limit in the accuracy of your measurement.
$$\Delta p\Delta t\sim \frac{\hbar}{c}$$
This is the highest accuracy theoretically attainable when the momentum is measured by a process occupying a given time $\Delta t$. Hence, in the relativistic theory, it is , in principle, impossible to make an arbitrary accurate and rapid measurement of the momentum. An exact measurement of momentum ($\Delta p\longrightarrow 0$) happen only in the limit the duration of measurement $\Delta t\longrightarrow\infty$.
In the rest frame of the particle, the least possible error in the measurement of its coordinates is
$$\Delta q\sim \frac{\hbar}{mc}$$
This value implies a momentum uncertainty of $mc$, while in a frame of reference in which the particle is moving with an energy $\varepsilon$, the momentum uncertainty becomes $\varepsilon/c$. In the ultra-relativistic limit
$$\Delta q\sim \frac{\hbar}{p}$$
i.e, the error in the measurement of coordinates is the same as the de Broglie wavelength of the particle. In the case of photons, it is always valid. So, it means that talking about the "coordinates of a photon" is meaningful only when the characteristic dimensions of the problem are large in comparison with its wavelength. This is the classical limit of geometrical optics, after which light tends to behave like wavess (diffraction). However in the quantum scale, coordinates of a photon has no meaning at all as the wavelength cannot be regarded as small in the quantum scale.
2
constant), but I think it has not the same meaning of what my question ask $\endgroup$ – CoffeDeveloper Nov 3 '16 at 17:23