1
$\begingroup$

The distribution is:

$$ f_\mathbf{v} (v_x, v_y, v_z) = \left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT} \right)^{3/2} \exp \left[- \frac{m(v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2)}{2kT} \right] $$

So, if I look at each dimension, it goes like $e^{-x}$. We will most likely to find particles with speed close to zero.

But if the distribution is shown in spherical coordinates:

$$ f(v) = \sqrt{\left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT}\right)^3}\, 4\pi v^2 e^{- \frac{mv^2}{2kT}} $$ And a rough graph: Rough Graph

Then I find it quite unlikely to find particles with speed around zero.

Why is the discrepancy? Can someone explain physically? Or is it just a math problem (I know that spherical coordinate is singular at $v=0$. So I keep saying "around zero". I think at least we should find many particles with speed close to zero.).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Given any small volume in velocity space, the patch near the origin will have the highest probability of having particles. But there aren't many patches near 0.

Not far from the origin, the probability is still pretty high, and there is more volume to integrate over.

Farther away, there is lots of volume to integrate over, but the probability is very low.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I see your point. But I have another doubt. Looking at each dimension, the average value for speed is zero. But over all, the average value for speed is nonzero. How to account for this? $\endgroup$ – taper Oct 30 '16 at 3:53
  • $\begingroup$ The average velocity is 0 because there is just as much negative X (leftward) as positive (rightward). The average speed is not 0. $\endgroup$ – mmesser314 Oct 30 '16 at 4:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.