enter image description hereImagine that the Sun is not rotating. It also has a tunnel throughout its body exactly through the core. Please disregard any other effect then gravity. From a far away point A (far from the Sun) I would shoot two entangled photons, one through the tunnel, and one a little bit next to the Sun (so just to pass next to the Sun). Point B is so that the line from point A to point B is on a straight (in 3D) line through the tunnel.

Now I am shooting the photons at an angle, such that both entangled photons will pass through both point A and B. (given GR/SR bending effects, the photon#2's path will be bent just right to pass through point B.)


  1. Which photon would according to GR/SR arrive at point B first?
  2. My question's answer could sound at first obvious, but considering that the photon travelling inside the tunnel would be affected by gravity too, the answer is not obvious.
  3. What if I use neutrinos or electrons(or anything fast enough with some rest mass ) instead of photons?
  • $\begingroup$ What about a nice picture to make it easier to understand? $\endgroup$ – user130529 Oct 26 '16 at 19:35
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Why is it relevant that the photons are entangled? $\endgroup$ – tparker Oct 26 '16 at 23:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_delay $\endgroup$ – Count Iblis Oct 27 '16 at 0:54
  • $\begingroup$ I understand the shapiro delay I believe. Both photons have to travel at speed c. In our 3D world, the path around is longer in length. So if we would exist in 3D the photon around would arrive later. But we exist in 4D, and a cornerstone to this question would be, since the one traveling through the tunnel is closer to the center of gravity, it has to be affected by time delation? So although its 3D path is shorter, its 4D path would be exactly the same as the path around? $\endgroup$ – Árpád Szendrei Oct 27 '16 at 16:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ once the photons interact, i.e. exchange a graviton, with the gravitational field of the sun (and your bending photon does that) the entanglement is broken anyway. This might enlighten you pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters_2017_Jan_1/… $\endgroup$ – anna v Dec 27 '16 at 7:13

It seems to me that your central question is: Does the particular lensed path light travels on affect its arrival time? If so, the answer is a resounding yes, with evidence from astronomy! For example, the Twin Quasar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Quasar) is a system consisting of two images of the same quasar, which traveled different paths to the observer and hence generate two different images. The interesting part of this is that one of the images is 400 days behind the other! Researchers identify this difference with a path length difference of 1.1 ly. So it seems that the photon with shorter path length (i.e. photon #1) would win.

To anticipate some attacks involving the fact that space is curved around a massive object and so maybe photon #2 wins, I say that the problem never provides dimensions, in particular the vertical separation between points A and B. Take those two points far enough away from each other, and it becomes extremely clear that, at least in this limit, photon 1 wins. At that point the total relative alteration to photon 1's path becomes miniscule, but photon 2 still has to travel in quite a large arc. My argument here is that since the Sun is (hopefully) not (yet) a compact object, but instead has a rather low density, significant curvature will not be seen within its body. Therefore, the same gentle-curvature limit should apply in all reasonable cases.


I think I have half of an answer for you. Following my old question about the reactionless drive (deleted now), I've worked out a formula for Shapiro delay in a straight line, through a tunnel in the mass.

The delay caused by mass is $t = (\ln(X/R)+1/3)2GM/c^3$ where $X$ is the distance between the point $A$ and the center of mass of the Sun

$R$ is the radius of the Sun

$M$ is the mass of the Sun

$c$ is the speed of light

The delay is from $X$ (in your drawing is $A$) to the center of the mass, so if you want to go to point B you have to take twice the time. After that, you have to get the Shapiro delay around the mass (actually, it is better to start with the path around so you can get the $A$ and $B$ points) and compare it with my formula.

My formula assumes that the density of the mass is constant (it matters when the photon goes inside the mass; when you get around it the density does not matter).

From my experience there is no straight answer to your question - it depends on the density variation of mass and the distance from which you launch the photon. You can have a winning photon either way.


Extreme value observations are a good way of making estimates.

If the star is a black hole, the photon passing by laterally clearly wins. If the star is not present, the photon flying at an angle to the observer never arrives.

As Misuser has already stated, it depends on the concrete parameters.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.