In the answer here and on the wiki article and many other articles it is mentioned that if one of 2 entangled particles is measured their state collapses according to the Copenhagen interpretation.

Lets take the example from the EPR paradox article, which mentions a positron and an electron occupying quantum states and becoming entangled. There are two observers, Alice and Bob.

In state I, the electron has spin pointing upward along the z-axis (+z) and the positron has spin pointing downward along the z-axis (-z).

In state II they are opposite.

Alice now measures the spin along the z-axis. She can obtain one of two possible outcomes: +z or -z. Suppose she gets +z. According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the system collapses into state I.

Meaning if Bob measures the spin, he will get -z.

My question is, what happens if Bob or Alice measure the spin along the z-axis again, will it remain z+ for Alice and z- for Bob or can it change between measurements?


Yes, if you measure the spin again and assuming the absence of a magnetic field, the measured value of $j_z$ of a particular electron will be the same as it was after the latest measurement of the same quantity – if nothing else was measured or happened in between.

This is true whether the observer is called Alice, Bob, or Barack. The reason why $j_z$ isn't changed is known as the angular momentum conservation law. So if Alice and Bob measure their electron's values of $j_z$ twice, the second measurements will be the same as the first ones, and they will obviously obey the same correlation as well.

However, if you measure e.g. $j_x$, the spin with respect to a perpendicular axis, in between, the final measurement of $j_z$ won't be correlated with the first one. In this perpendicular case, the final $j_z$ will have 50% vs 50% probability to be up and down, respectively, regardless of the value of $j_x$ we measured in between. The state of a spin-1/2 particle – i.e. all the predictions we can make for future measurements of the spin – are fully dictated by the last measurement we did.

  • $\begingroup$ After you added: "if nothing else was measured or happened in between." it got confusing again, how can something be measured in between the first and the second measurement? $\endgroup$ May 21 '12 at 18:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It would be in between the first and second measurements of $j_z$. In such a case the second measurement of $j_z$ would be the third measurement overall. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    May 21 '12 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ "The reason why $j_z$ isn't changed is known as the angular momentum conservation law." I think this reason is wrong. By the same reasoning, $j_x$ cannot change as well. The real reason $j_z$ remains the same is because the state collapsed into an eigenstate of $j_z$ after the latest measurements. $\endgroup$
    – Siyuan Ren
    May 22 '12 at 1:51
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Karsus, indeed, by the same reasoning, $j_x$ cannot change, either. By rotational invariance, the behavior of $j_x$ and $j_z$ is obviously the same behavior. And indeed, it doesn't change. When you measure $j_x$ twice, you get the same result. If you measure $j_x$ and then $j_z$, the probability of $j_z=+1/2$ is 50% just like that of $j_z=-1/2$ after the first measurement. And $j_z$ doesn't change between the two measurements; the second measurement just determines which answer was right. The terminology of a "collapse" is always misleading. There is no "collapse" as a real process. $\endgroup$ May 22 '12 at 4:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.