In Kleppner and Kolenkow’s Introduction to Mechanics, I’ve been shown the derivation for the equation $$L_z=I_{cm}\omega+(\textbf{R}_{cm}\:\times M\textbf{V}_{cm})_z$$ where $L_z$ is the angular momentum of an object rotating around a translating, fixed axis. My question is why you would ever use this formula. Can you not set $\textbf{R}=0$ (i.e. origin at the center of mass) and use $L_z=I\omega$, as you usually do? As far as I’m concerned, $L_z=I\omega$ works for all cases where the axis is fixed (i.e. axis direction is unchanging). That means even if the axis is translating, it can still be used, right?
My book continues,
[The equation derived] is valid even if the center of mass is accelerating, because L was calculated with respect to an inertial coordinate system.
Does that imply that $L_z=I\omega$ doesn’t work when the axis is accelerating? If it’s still translational acceleration, then the axis is still fixed, and as far as I know we can still use it.
In what situation would we ever use the more complicated equation at the top over the simple $L_z=I\omega$?