4
$\begingroup$

I have been watching a lot of videos of the double slit experiment and trying to wrap my head around it. I found examples of where the experiment has been done, however the videos cut out and only simulate the effect an observer has on it. I understand that the wave interference pattern collapses when an observer is put into play.

Is there a video that displays the observer effect in comparison to the regular double slit experiment? I would like to see how observing the particles before and after they go through the slit changes the resulting patterns.

Follow up question:

I watched this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iuv6hY6zsd0

This video demonstrates the interference pattern created by sunlight in a box. I understand that this is how light behaves (photons? Particles? I am not sure ...)

Question: would it be possible to do this experiment, and somehow "measure" the light before or after it goes through the slits, to create the pattern that is created when observing?

And if not, why is that?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of The observer detail of double slit experiment $\endgroup$ – stafusa Mar 12 '18 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ The results of this experiment, in a strange sense, tell you what you already know. If you don't know which slit the photons are going through, you get a wave result in the interference pattern. If you put a detector on one or both slits, you know which slit the photons are going through, and you get a particle result in the interference pattern. In effect, the observer becomes part of the experiment whether he wants to or not! $\endgroup$ – David White Sep 18 '18 at 1:45
  • $\begingroup$ You are not allowed to watch the videos of the experiment without an observer. $\endgroup$ – M. Enns Sep 29 at 2:03
1
$\begingroup$

Great question! I suspect the reason you can't find videos (although I haven't looked for them myself) is because most of the videos of interference will be videos of photon interference, since that is the easiest kind of interference experiment to do. However, the only kind of measurements we can perform on photons in this experimental context are what we call "destructive" measurements: for example, you could just block off one of the two slits, and then for any of the photons that get through you will know which slit they went through... but you will be destroying the other half of the photons.

This is therefore not as compelling an illustration of the collapse of interference patterns as an experiment in which you can measure which slit the particles go through while still allowing them to pass through the slits. For this, you need to use some other kind of particles, such as electrons. This has been done, and the interference pattern indeed collapses when you measure which slit each electron passes through, but I still don't know if there is a video...

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I know it's a while since you posted your question but I wonder if you ever found the type of video you were looking for. I ask because I have found the same thing - that it is hard to find an actual video of the interference pattern disappearing when a measuring device is introduced, surprisingly hard to find given the significance of the effect.

One reason may be the nature of the experimental results, e.g. link below to delayed-choice quantum erasure experiment shows the experimental results indicating interference and non-interference:

https://youtu.be/u9bXolOFAB8

If you have found a suitable video in the meantime I would be very interested in hearing.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think you will always at least get a single slit diffraction pattern. There is never a case where only two clean lines appear behind the slits. I had seen animations where two lines appear but never a real photo. As long as we’re talking about visible light this is the case $\endgroup$ – Lambda Nov 24 '18 at 16:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.