In the paper, ``Comments on String Dynamics in Six Dimensions" (arXiv:hep-th/9603003) by Seiberg and Witten, there is a sentence on page 8 (section 3) which reads

classically, smooth $E_8$ instantons with $n = 1, 2,$ or $3$ do not exist.

$n$ refers to the winding number (corresponding to the embedding of $SU(2$) in $E_8$).

My question is: why do the winding numbers $n = 1, 2, 3$ not exist? What is meant by smooth instantons?

Also, is the $n \neq \{1,2,3\}$ constraint valid for K3 compactifications or is it more general?

  • Do you have a reason to suspect it means something other than the general notion of an instanton in a gauge theory with gauge group $G=E_8$? – ACuriousMind Oct 13 '16 at 13:23
  • No, I do not. But what are smooth instantons and why don't they exist for $n = 1, 2, 3$? – leastaction Oct 13 '16 at 13:45

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.