A lens is used to turn the diverging color rays from the first prism into converging ones. Now this is just a comic and I'm not sure if correctness of the optics was a major goal, but I still wonder if this would actually work.
The problem I see is that the angles don't work out.
On the left, (original cover art) the angle between the white ray and the purple ray is the most acute angle
On the right, ("inverse" operation) it's exactly the opposite: here, red and white have the most acute angle
Could the rays that hit the right prism in that way really come out as one white ray?
I'm embarrassed to admit that I do not own the album myself in a form that includes the entire cover. After a bit of googling I found the original cover art with both sides here:
On this one, the angles of the individual colored rays are still diverging, because there's no additional lens involved changing that. On both prisms, red and white have the least acute angle.
However, the rays are diverging towards the prism on the left and are also diverging from the prism on the right. There's a rule in optics that rays have no direction and could be considered coming from either direction. According to this rule, there's a problem in the image, because on one prism, the rays are diverging towards it, while on the other, they are converging towards it. Given that the result (white ray) should be the same, this contradicts with the rule, doesn't it?
Can color rays that are diverging towards a prism really be recombined to a white ray in the prism on the left?
Which of the two prism optics pictured above is correct? Or are they both correct? Or neither one?