1
$\begingroup$

Just having some trouble with a question about Fabry-Perot intereferometers. Here's the first part of the question:

Consider a beam of light undergoing multiple reflections in a Fabry-Perot cavity between two surfaces, both with reflectance R, and with no absorption.

What fraction of the original beam power entering the cavity is left in the beam inside the cavity after a number N of reflections?

So my problem is incorporating N into my final answer. I've derived a general equation of the electric amplitude of the reflected waves inside the cavity (as shown in this diagram), which I found to be:

$E_N = A·τ·ρ'^N·e^{i(ωt-Nδ)}$,

where ρ is the Fresnel reflection coefficient and τ is the transmission coefficient [Not sure if the equation is entirely correct]

And by geometric series:

$Ec = \frac{A·τ·e^{i·ω·t}}{(1-R)^2·e^{-iδ}}$

Using a power density function for both inside the cavity Sc and the original beam S:

$Sc = \frac{1}{2}·n_f·c·ε(Ec^*·Ec)$,

where E* is a complex conjugate

$S = \frac{1}{2}·n·c·ε·A^2$

I get: $\frac{S_c}{S} =\frac{ τ^2 }{(1-R)^2 ·(1+C·sin^2 (\frac{δ}{2}))}$,

where C is $\frac{4R^2}{(1-R)^2}$

So, as you can see, this ratio doesn't have the number of reflections N, and I'm not sure where to go from here.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe you can give some Refs on Fabry-Perot intereferometers that you were looking at in your context. It may help people to follow. $\endgroup$ – wonderich Sep 30 '16 at 1:07
  • $\begingroup$ This is very hard to read. You can do us (and yourself) a favor by using MathJax. Here’s a MathJax tutorial Without reading in detail (I can't!) I might suggest that perhaps you did not truncate the geometric series correctly. $\endgroup$ – garyp Sep 30 '16 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ You are on the right track. What changes with each pass? How do you sum the total loss out of the cavity for N passes? It is staring you in the face... $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Sep 30 '16 at 1:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for advice! I've tried to edit all formulas, should be easy to read now. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Sep 30 '16 at 4:30
  • $\begingroup$ This precise problem is addressed in Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Measurements Across Broad Absorbance and Reflectivity Ranges. Dasgupta, P. K., Bhawal, R.; Li, Y.-H. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 3727-3734. doi:10.1021/ac404251w $\endgroup$ – Purnendu K Dasgupta Jan 6 '17 at 19:48
0
$\begingroup$

The geometric series is described here as follows. If $r$ is a complex number such that $|r|<1$, then the sum of a finite number of powers of $n$ is: $$\sum_{k=1}^nr^k = \frac{r(1-r^n)}{1-r}.$$

In the limit as $n\to\infty$, we get $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty r^k = \frac{r}{1-r}.$$

The only I can see that you could lose the $n$ dependence is to take the infinite limit.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.