0
$\begingroup$

I am following Peskin. During the derivation of the Dirac field (boosting the solution from the rest frame), we use that $(\vec{p}\cdot \vec{\sigma})^2 = |p|^2$. Where $\vec{p}$ is momentum vector, and $\vec{\sigma}$ is the Pauli matrices-vector. I dont see how this is correct. I believe I saw a short proof using the anti-commutator of the sigma matrices. It went something like: $$ (\vec{p}\cdot \vec{\sigma})^2 = p^i\sigma^i p^j \sigma^j = p^i p^j \frac{1}{2}\{\sigma^i, \sigma^j\} = |p|^2, $$

I understand the first equality, but not the rest. Can you present a short explaination/proof?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Tell us why it is wrong. $\endgroup$ – AMS Sep 21 '16 at 18:27
  • $\begingroup$ I hope it's true, just can't see why it's true. Its probably obvious $\endgroup$ – Mikkel Rev Sep 21 '16 at 18:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Simplest way is to write the matrix $\mathbf{p}\cdot\mathbf{\sigma}$ explicitly. $\endgroup$ – Javier Sep 21 '16 at 18:33
3
$\begingroup$

As far as I know, what is true is that $$(\vec{p}\cdot \vec{\sigma})^2=\vec{p} \cdot \vec{p}=|\vec{p}|^2$$ and so what you want to prove is not true unless your $\vec{p}$ is a unit vector. Is this the reason why you are confused? Otherwise for the last step you just need to use the fact that $$\{\sigma_i,\sigma_j\}=2\delta_{ij}I$$ which you can easily prove yourself by checking the actual matrix multiplications. On the other hand the step $$p^i\sigma^i p^j \sigma^j = p^i p^j \frac{1}{2}\{\sigma^i, \sigma^j\}$$ is done by substituting the product $\sigma_i\sigma_j$ with its symmetric part. This is possible since any antisymmetric part would disappear after contraction with the symmetric tensor $p^ip^j$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by: "substituting the product σiσj with its symmetric part"? Thanks $\endgroup$ – Mikkel Rev Sep 22 '16 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ Each tensor $T_{ij}$ can be written as the sum of a symmetric part $1/2 (T_{ij}+T_{ji})$ and an antisymmetric part $1/2 (T_{ij}-T_{ji})$. If the tensor is $T_{ij}=\sigma_i\sigma_j$ its symmetric part is exactly the anticommutator of the sigmas (and their commutator is the antisymmetric part) $\endgroup$ – DelCrosB Sep 22 '16 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. $\sigma^i \sigma^j = \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^i \sigma^j + \sigma^j \sigma^i) + \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^i \sigma^j - \sigma^j \sigma^i) = \frac{1}{2}\{\sigma^j ,\sigma^i\} + \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^i \sigma^j - \sigma^j \sigma^i)$. And how does the last part vanish when I contract it with $p_i p _j$? $\endgroup$ – Mikkel Rev Sep 22 '16 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. And the last two terms give $1/2[\sigma_i, \sigma_j]$ $\endgroup$ – DelCrosB Sep 22 '16 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ If $S^{ij}$ is symmetric in $i$ and $j$ and $A_{ij}$ is antisymmetric, then $S^{ij}A_{ij}=0$ This is a nice simple exercise and a very handy trick to know if you work with tensors. $\endgroup$ – DelCrosB Sep 22 '16 at 12:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.