I have a small RC-controlled toy helicopter with removable tail rotor.

Suppose I remove the tail rotor, hold the tail with my hand, start the rotor until it moves with constant angular velocity and then let it go. Suppose that the heli remains on the floor all the time.

Then the body of the helicopter begins to turn into the opposite direction of the rotor.

My problem is to explain this in terms of angular momentum. At first this seemed to contradict angular momentum conservation because I assumed that the helicopter is a closed system and there is no external torque, but the rotor keeps the same angular velocity while the body starts to turn into the other direction.

My second thought was that I have to take the air into account. If I do that it seems plausible to me to explain it as follows:

The rotor transfers angular momentum from to the surrounding air. However to keep it running at constant angular velocity, the motor has to transfer angular momentum to the rotor, which is only possible if the body of the helicopter gets the same amount of angular momentum as goes to the rotor, but into the opposite direction.

But then I thought, the body should turn faster and faster to infinity which obviously doesn't happen. So I guessed I should also take the friction with the floor into account where the angular momentum of the body is transferred to.

This leads me to the following three questions:

  1. Is my reasoning described above correct or I am completely wrong?

  2. If I would do the experiment on an almost frictionless turntable (which I don't have available at the moment), would the body of the helicopter indeed become faster and faster almost to infinity?

  3. If I would do the same thing in a vacuum, what would happen? I guess (see my first thought above), that the body wouldn't turn at all. Is that correct?

So it would be great if someone could clarify this in terms of angular momentum.

Since the same problem should occur in real helicopters, I guess that there should be some detailed literature about it's physics, but I didn't find any resources about this. So if you have any references for more details or further reading on this problem, it would be also great if you could post it.


2 Answers 2


The air is of course the key to understand your questions. To start with the last question, as you figured out right yourself, in vacuum body of the helicopter would not turn at all. But in vacuum helicopter could not fly at all!

enter image description here

At least part of the principle of rotor is that by pushing air down makes helicopter airborne. However in order to do that, blades of the rotor are a bit inclined, so when blade hits air right with velocity $\vec{v}$, it pushes air mostly down and but also to right with force $\vec{F}_\text{B}$. Third Newton law tells us that in that case air pushes blade mostly up, but also to left with force $\vec{F}_\text{A}$.

The vertical push $\vec{F}_\text{V}$ makes helicopter airborne. However, the horizontal push $\vec{F}_\text{H}$ to blades creates torque which changes total angular momentum of the helicopter. In order to stop body of helicopter spinning you have to create oposite torque and you do that by tail rotor (or in your case by friction of the floor). If there is no tail rotor or friction of the floor, body of the helicopter would spin faster and faster until the drag of the air due to body of the helicopter spinning is so large, that creates apropriate torque.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it's correct to say that the body would not turn at all in a vacuum. The body would turn to conserve angular momentum as the rotor of the helicopter is sped up or slowed down. In addition, any friction in the rotor shaft will cause a reaction torque as well. $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    May 29, 2020 at 20:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I just followed OP original suggestion "Suppose I remove the tail rotor, hold the tail with my hand, start the rotor until it moves with constant angular velocity and then let it go." No mention of rotor speeding up or slowing down. Friction is much more serious problem, because it always exists and tends to equalize angular velocity of helicopter and rotor. Take this into account and, obviously, the body would eventually start turning. $\endgroup$
    – Pygmalion
    May 29, 2020 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Right, sorry I missed the key part, constant angular velocity, thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    May 29, 2020 at 20:55

The toy is simply a rotor and a body with a motor that induces torque in opposing directions on these two parts. Remember Newton's laws, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction; in this case, the motor doesn't care whether it's pushing the rotor in one direction or the body in the other, it just applies the torque. Similarly, the floor induces torque on the body in the opposite direction as the engine because of the frictive forces restricting motion; the same is true of the air though it offers less resistence. It is incorrect to consider the helicoptor a closed system because of it's interaction with the environment.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.