My basic understanding of the CMB tells me that this 'wall of radiation' is currently the furthest electromagnetic wave from our position that we can detect. Through relativity we know that objects far away are seen in an 'older' state due to the emitted photons taking time to reach our measuring tools.

My understanding is that as there is effectively no centre of the universe, so the CMB was emitted from every point of the universe roughly 300 thousand years after the Big Bang as it cooled and expanded. I understand that the CMB we detect today has travelled roughly 47 billion light years to reach us (EDIT: unsure on figures) and therefore we are effectively seeing the universe roughly 13.8 billion years ago.

My questions are as follows. Suppose we are an observer in a hypothetical Galaxy X located 47 billion light years (EDIT: unsure on figures) from the Milky Way Galaxy. We launch our own microwave detecting satellite and survey our sky.

If there is no centre or starting point of the universe, when we look out far enough from Galaxy X do we see the same CMB beginnings that an observer in the Milky Way Galaxy sees?

When looking back towards the Milky Way Galaxy do we simply see CMB from roughly 13.8 billion years ago?

If everywhere is effectively the centre of the universe, I would expect an observer from every Galaxy in the universe to see the same CMB?

If there was an observer at every point of the universe, would we expect them to all see the same CMB when looking out with microwave measuring equipment?

Would they all argue that they are in the present time and every direction they observe at far enough distances are further back in time?

Am I on the 'right track' here?



EDIT: unsure on figures. Questions still stand to be answered.

  • $\begingroup$ " ... has travelled roughly 47 billion light years to reach us and therefore we are effectively seeing the universe roughly 13.8 billion years ago." This seems contradictory to me. Shouldn't these numbers be equal? $\endgroup$ Sep 9 '16 at 5:19
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps. As I understand it the universe is expanding so the distance of that 'source' or our observable universe is roughly 13.8 billion years old but the distance to the edge of this observable universe is roughly 47 billion light years. $\endgroup$
    – Dan
    Sep 9 '16 at 6:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @flippiefanus: the galaxies we see from 13.8 billion years ago have been moving away for the last 13.8 billion years, and right now they are about 46 billion years away. Though of course we won't see that for another 32.2 billion years :-) $\endgroup$ Sep 9 '16 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ Added an EDIT. Have the concept wrong in my head. Questions still stand to be answered. $\endgroup$
    – Dan
    Sep 9 '16 at 6:11
  • $\begingroup$ unfaisable thought experiment, you cannot compare so far datas, but perhaps you can register it and wait for a possible big bounce, hoping that a homolog in curiosity has prepared the same for the comparison $\endgroup$
    – user46925
    Sep 9 '16 at 14:23

The CMB will look very nearly the same to both us and your observer on a distant galaxy.

Your argument is correct. Our model for the expansion of the universe is based on the assumption that the universe is the same everywhere - technically that is it isotropic and homogeneous. Though at the current time this is obviously untrue on the small scale (because we have dense objects like stars separated by vacuum) it appears to be true if we average the matter distribution on a large scale. And at the time the CMB was emitted, well before any stars formed, the distribution of matter was homogeneous to better than one part in $10^5$.

So we expect that for every observer everywhere in the inverse the CMB is going to look the same - to about one part in $10^5$. That one part in $10^5$ is the fluctuations in the CMB most recently measured by the WMAP experiment. The current favourite explanation for these is that they originated in quantum fluctuations during cosmological inflation, and because these fluctuations are random they are randomly distributed and will look different for different observers.

However, even the fluctuations will look the same in some respects. Though the detail of the fluctuations will be different for different observers we expect that their power spectrum will be the same for everyone.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for answering @John Rennie. Just to clarify my understanding. As the universe is expanding - do we detect CMB that has travelled the 46 billion light years due to this expansion or do we see CMB that has travelled only 13.8 billion light years but whose source is now 46 billion light years away, which we won't detect again for another 32 billion years? $\endgroup$
    – Dan
    Sep 9 '16 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Dan: once you move into the realm of GR you find that concepts like distance travelled become observer dependent. So your question doesn't really have an answer. The only uniquely defined concept of distance is proper distance, but this doesn't help much as the proper distance travelled by light is always zero. $\endgroup$ Sep 9 '16 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for clarifying @John Rennie. I will look further into it. $\endgroup$
    – Dan
    Sep 9 '16 at 7:59

In fact, the CMB could look substantially different.

The strongest feature on the CMB is not its well-known speckle pattern, but a blue/redshift dipole due to the movement of our local group. This dipole is usually removed in most representations.

In a very distant galaxy, this dipole could be absent or stronger or point in another direction.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.