# Calculating the potential on a surface from the potential on another surface

The question is short: If a charge (or mass) distribution $\rho$ is enclosed by surface $S_1$, I can calculate the electrostatic (or gravitational) potential on that surface by integrating $\rho(r') \ / \ |r-r'|$ for each point $r$ on $S_1$,. Now, if I want to use only the potential distribution on $S_1$ to calculate the potential on another surface $S_2$ which also encloses $\rho$ and could enclose $S_1$, be enclosed by $S_1$, or intersect $S_1$, is it solvable, will the solution be unique, and is there a name for this calculation I can use to read further?

(If you are feeling generous - you might even outline how to do it. I have a hunch it means putting a surface at large $r$ where the higher order multipoles go to zero, but I am not sure.)

An example of this would be to propagate a gravitational potential model of the Earth on one surface to another surface, where both surfaces enclose the Earth, without necessarily trying to find solutions for the mass distribution within the Earth as an intermediate step.

above: illustration of one of the three cases - here $S_2$ intersects $S_1$.

The rest was added in order to "show some effort" in order to remove the previous hold: Here is what I do understand so far. I'll plot a 2D problem for easier display. I can define three charge (or mass) distributions such that the total density is non-negative. Newton's shell theorem tells us that for a 1/r potential in 3 dimensions, outside of the distribution - the result is the same for extended superimposed spherical distributions or point chargers.

locs = [(0, 0), (0.5, 0), (0.0, 0.8)]  # locations
Rs   = [1.0,     0.5,      0.2      ]  # radii of distributions
rhos = [1.0,    -1.0,     20.0      ]  # density of distributions
qs   = [rho*(fourpi/3)*R**3 for (rho, R) in zip(rhos, Rs)]  # equivalent point charges


note: I want to solve the 3D problem, where Newton's shell theorem applies. The 2D plots here are simply to help illustrate where I am at the moment.

Plotting the external potential, and the density distribution:

I can define two boundaries at R=1.1 and R=1.9, and calculate the potential on those boundaries. I could also choose an orthogonal set of basis functions such as Spherical Harmonics for a spherical boundary in 3D, and just a Fourier Series for a circular boundary in 2D (shown below):

Now suppose only have the potential on the enclosing boundary of a charge-free region. In that case, the potential in that region is the solution of Laplace's equation and it is completely defined and unique. There are several ways to find it. A set of basis functions could be fit, but I'll do it the easy(?) way - the Jacobi method a numerical technique where in the case of a 2D square grid, you calculate an array of the averages of the four nearest neighbors, and then update the whole array with the new numbers. It is slow and there are several ways to speed it up, but I'll just use the simplest form here:

Iterating thousands of times with the simplest (slowest) algorithm:

(I know, I shouldn't use jet - cf. here and here.)

However: my question is about how to handle the situation where you have the potential on one circular (or spherical) boundary. The reason I showed the Fourier transform above is to suggest that all higher order terms drop rapidly with radius, and so it may be possible that I can at least have a second boundary at very large r and "know" that the potential is just $q_{tot}/r$ as r goes to infinity. So I have a feeling that could come in handy.

So I have three cases: $S_2$ encloses $S_1$, $S_2$ is enclosed by $S_1$, or $S_2$ intersects $S_1$ in some straightforward way.

What are the techniques and assumptions I need in order to solve for the potential on $S_2$, given the potential on $S_1$, without having to go back and generate some solution for the generating mass (or charge) distribution again? Are all, or any of the three cases solvable?

above: illustration of one of the three cases - here $S_2$ intersects $S_1$.

The key to solving this is using the multipole expansion of the charge distribution, at least in the case where $$S_1$$ is spherical. Since both $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$ are outside the distribution, you can write the potential there as $$V(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{l=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^l Q_{lm} \frac{ Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) }{r^{l+1}},$$ with respect to some fixed origin inside the distribution. Here the $$Q_{lm}$$ are the multipole moments, which can be obtained as integrals over the charge distribution, but you can also get them from the potential itself.

To do this, you just need to do a surface integral along $$S_1$$ of $$V$$ against a suitable spherical harmonic, making sure that the surface element reduces strictly to the solid angle on the unit sphere. In particular, take $$I_{lm} = \int_{S_1} V(\mathbf r)r^{l+1}Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)^* \mathrm d\Omega,$$ where $$\mathrm d\Omega= \displaystyle\frac{\hat{\mathbf r}\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf S}{r^2}$$. Substituting in the series and using the orthogonality of the spherical harmonics, you get that $$I_{lm}=Q_{lm}$$, i.e. you recover full information on $$V$$ using only its dependence along $$S_1$$.

• Hey thank you very much!! I'll need a day or so to sit down and try it out, but I have (more than) a hunch that it will work nicely. I'll start with $S_1$ as a sphere, then try other shapes - taking care with the solid angle as you mention. Very nice answer! – uhoh Oct 13 '16 at 12:24
• apparently this question meets with resistance, perhaps I will never be able to fully understand what makes one question successful and another not in Physics SE. But if you have any thoughts on that question or would like to add an answer, that would be great! – uhoh Nov 5 '20 at 2:26

I think a good phrase to search on would be "Solving the Laplace equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions."

(Though this will give you the potential everywhere, not just on a surface.)

This Wikipedia article discusses existence and uniqueness. (Usually you'll have both in a real physical problem.)

• excellent - this is exactly what I needed. Thanks! – uhoh Sep 7 '16 at 3:07
• When solving for the potential on $S_2$, if it intersects $S_1$ it isn't really Dirichlet boundary conditions is it? Neither so if $S_2$ encloses $S_1$; although I suppose I could invert the problem - guess or parameterize a potential on $S_2$ as my BC, solve for $S_1$, and iterate or diagonalize. If that works, then for the intersecting case I can subdivide the surfaces where they intersect perhaps. – uhoh Sep 7 '16 at 6:05
• I've removed the acceptance - I've had to expand and refocus the text of the question a bit to show "some effort" in order to remove the hold, and it looks like the question needs a bit more specific of an answer. – uhoh Sep 11 '16 at 16:39