1
$\begingroup$

Gauss's Law

I am trying to do this calculation using Gauss's Law.

$$ Φ_Ε = \int \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac{Q_{in}}{ε_0}$$

One of the ways to derive this law is to concider a spherical surface at the centre of which there is a point charge.

Because of the symmetry the field has the same value in every point of the Gaussian surface.

$$ \int E\hat r \cdot dA \hat r= \int EdA =EA = \frac{q}{ε_0} $$

If i want to calculate it by solving the surface integral would I differentiate the surface of the sphere?

$$dA=d(4πr^2)=8πrdr $$

$$ \int EA = \int \frac{k_eQ_{in}}{r^2} 8πrdr = \int \frac{2Q_{in}}{ε_0r}dr$$

But this is not the right outcome. Is it maybe because the $dr$ indicates a change only in radial direction?

Calculation of the spherical distribution

Since the distribution is spherically symmetrical the charge density is $ρ=ρ(r)$, right? In case for example when we want to calculate the field at a point inside the sphere:

$$ E= \frac{Qin}{4πr^2ε_0} = \frac{ \int^a_0 ρ(r)dV}{4πa^2}=\frac{ \int^a_0 ρ(r)4πr^2dr}{4πa^2}$$

Where $ a \le R$

End

So I guess what i am askind is can I solve these integrals by further differentiating the differentials?

i.e. $dA \to 8πrdr$ or $dV \to 4πr^2dr $

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The short answer to your question about the manipulation $dA \to 8\pi r\,dr$ is that no, you cannot perform this manipulation to do the surface integral since the integral is being taken over a surface of constant radius, and this manipulation would have you integrate with respect to the radius. Note that the expression $8\pi r\,dr$ is a literal interpretation of how the surface area of the ball changes with small changes of the radius $dr$.

If you want to evaluate the integral $\iint_S d\vec A\cdot \vec E$, you will have to note that the differential area element $d\vec A$ is $( r^2\sin\theta \,d\theta\,d\phi)\,\hat r$, and that the integral is being taken over the range $\theta \in [0,\pi]$, $\phi \in [0,2\pi)$, not over $r$ since we are evaluating the integral at constant $r$. Formally, you are parametrizing the surface of the ball of radius $r$:

$$ S(\phi, \theta) = (x(\phi,\theta),y(\phi,\theta),z(\phi,\theta)), $$ and computing the surface integral using the Jacobian factor $r^2\sin\theta\,d\theta\,d\phi$. Hence,

$$ \iint_S d\vec A\cdot \vec E = \frac{Q_{\text{in}}}{\varepsilon_0}\iint_S d\phi\,d\theta\,\frac{r^2\sin\theta}{4\pi r^2} = \frac{Q_{\text{in}}}{\varepsilon_0}\frac{4\pi}{4\pi} = \frac{Q_{\text{in}}}{\varepsilon_0}. $$ Since $\iint_S d\phi\,d\theta\,\sin\theta = 4\pi$.

As for the electric field a distance $a$ from the center of a spherically-symmetric charge distribution $\rho(r)$, yes you still pull out Gauss's law: $$ \iint_{S_a} d\vec A\cdot \vec E = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\iiint_B dV\,\rho(r) \implies \vec E(a) = \hat r\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 a^2} \iiint_B dV\,\rho( r). $$ In this second case, the volume $V$ of the ball is given by $4\pi r^3/3$, and the manipulation $dV = 4\pi r^2\,dr$ is valid since in this case, we are integrating over the volume of the ball, not just a surface of constant radius.

In each case, pay attention to your region of integration. If the region is at a constant radius, you will not integrate with respect to the radius. If the region is a volume integral, you will integrate with respect to the radius (so long as the region has spherical symmetry).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.