In q. 22 in page 141, I am asked to show that if

$$U^{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha} V^{\beta} = W^{\beta},$$



Here's what I have done: $$V_{\beta}=g_{\beta \gamma} V^{\gamma},$$ so $$U^{\alpha} \nabla_{\alpha} (g_{\beta \gamma} V^{\gamma})=U^{\alpha}(\nabla_{\alpha} g_{\beta \gamma}) V^{\gamma} + g_{\beta \gamma} (U^{\alpha} \nabla_{\alpha} V^{\gamma}).$$

Now, I understand that the second term is $W_{\beta}$, but how come the first term vanishes?


The covariant derivative is metric compatible, so $\nabla_{\alpha} g_{\beta \gamma} = 0$. This is the condition that the inner product is preserved under parallel transport.


I don't think you need metric compatibility to prove this although you can use it. There is a much simpler way with repeated use of (any) metric to lower the index.

$ U^\alpha\nabla_\alpha V^\beta=W^\beta $

$ \Rightarrow U^\alpha g^{\beta\gamma}\nabla_\alpha V_\gamma=g^{\beta\gamma}V_\gamma $

$ \Rightarrow U^\alpha g_{\mu\beta}g^{\beta\gamma}\nabla_\alpha V_\gamma=g_{\mu\beta}g^{\beta\gamma}V_\gamma $

$ \Rightarrow U^\alpha\delta_\mu^\gamma\nabla_\alpha V_\gamma=\delta_\mu^\gamma V_\gamma $

$ \Rightarrow U^\alpha\nabla_\alpha V_\mu=V_\mu $

there are three ways to do the first step, only one uses metric compatibility. More at https://www.general-relativity.net/2019/10/symmetries-and-killing-vectors.html


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.