Stellar models indicate that red dwarfs less than 0.35 M☉ are fully convective.[3] Hence the helium produced by the thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen is constantly remixed throughout the star, avoiding its buildup at the core and prolonging the period of fusion. Red dwarfs therefore develop very slowly, maintaining a constant luminosity and spectral type for trillions of years, until their fuel is depleted. Because of the comparatively short age of the universe, no red dwarfs exist at advanced stages of evolution. - Wikipedia

Red dwarf stars are tiny. Is this why they can have convection currents?

Red Dwarf Gliese 623b:

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ I don't think red dwarf stars are the only stars with convective currents. However, I think they are some of the few that are dominated by convective currents. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Aug 23 '16 at 12:39
  • $\begingroup$ I mean like I'm sure all stars have a small amount of convection occurring but why do only red dwarfs have such large convection currents that last so long and evenly burn out the star? $\endgroup$ – EasyPeasy Aug 23 '16 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ From later in the Wikipedia page: In general, red dwarfs less than 0.35 M☉ transport energy from the core to the surface by convection. Convection occurs because of opacity of the interior, which has a high density compared to the temperature. As a result, energy transfer by radiation is decreased, and instead convection is the main form of energy transport to the surface of the star. Above this mass, a red dwarf will have a region around its core where convection does not occur. $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Aug 23 '16 at 13:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Red dwarf stars have convection currents that reach the inner fusion core. This distributes matters so the core is refreshed with protons. The sun and other more massive stars have a radiative region adjacent to the core and above that a convection layer. My "stellar astrophysics 101" level of understanding is insufficient to address this question. This is an interesting question and the convection of M-stars is a reason they can last over a trillion years. Avi Loeb has recently speculated on this with respect to intelligent life. $\endgroup$ – Lawrence B. Crowell Aug 23 '16 at 14:16

Low-mass M dwarfs are the only stars that are fully convective, but most stars have at least some convection going on either in the core or in the outer envelope.

Convection occurs because the temperature gradient exceeds the adiabatic temperature gradient and becomes susceptible to convective instabilities.

If a star has a temperature gradient exactly equal to the adiabatic temperature gradient, then a parcel of rising gas in pressure equilibrium with its surroundings will change its temperature in exactly the same way as its surroundings and nothing really happens. If the modulus of the (negative) temperature gradient of the surroundings is higher, then as the parcel rises it expands because it is hotter than the gas around it. This makes it more buoyant and it rises further.

The key to your question is to examine the conditions under which the temperature gradient in a star becomes large enough to trigger convection. There are basically three cases where this happens.

  1. The opacity of the gas to radiation becomes large. The temperature gradient then must become larger to carry the same energy flux. Roughly speaking $$\frac{dT}{dr} \propto \kappa,$$ where $\kappa$ is the opacity of the gas.

  2. The adiabatic temperature gradient could become smaller due to changes in the adiabatic index - for instance where ionisation state of the gas changes near the photosphere.

  3. If the heat generation in the core of a star is very temperature sensitive then this induces a very steep temperature gradient. Main sequence stars more massive than the Sun generate energy through the CNO cycle, which is more temperature sensitive than the pp chain, and hence have convective cores.

In low-mass M-dwarfs it is mechanism (1) that is in operation. The opacity in a star is approximated by Kramer's opacity $$\kappa \propto \rho T^{-7/2},$$ where $\rho$ is the density and $T$ the temperature.

M-dwarfs are denser than more massive stars and have lower interior temperatures. The opacity of the gas is so high that convective instability is present throughout the star (except right at the photosphere). In higher mass main sequence stars, the opacity in the interior is low enough (at higher temperatures) to avoid convective instability. But convection then happens in the cooler outer layers (e.g. in the Sun).

| cite | improve this answer | |

Well smaller stars can transfer there heat quicker to their surface and this means the temperature gradient can be greater than the adiabatic gradient. So the forces of temperature and heat transfer takes over and convection happens. This convection process actually prolongs the life of the red giant. Red giant is going to burn same amount of hydrogen our sun burns(1/10 of its hydrogen). This is because all the hydrogen that is burned is in or near the core. For a red dwarf hydrogen is supplied throughout the star. Also the more convection that happens inside a red dwarf the more the temperature gradient will win over the adiabatic gradient. This results in more convection currents inside a red dwarf.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.