Summary: at relativistic speeds, if you compute a planet's relative distance using angular diameter (roughly proportional to 1/angular diameter), will that computed distance increase or decrease linearly, assuming you are traveling directly towards or directly away from the planet? Example:

A ship starts at Earth, accelerates to 0.8c, and travels to a planet P 10 light years away.

The ship pilot knows the diameter of P, and uses the angular diameter to compute his distance from P.

When the ship accelerates from 0 to 0.8c, P's angular diameter does not change (is that correct?), so the pilot defines that diameter to correspond to 10ly (he's using the reference frame of the Earth/planet for this definition only).

The journey takes 7.5 years ship clock time; as the ship approaches t=7.5, P's angular diameter tells the pilot his distance is approaching 0.

Question: does the distance as computed from the angular diameter (which is roughly the reciprocal of the angular diameter) decrease linearly during the pilot's journey? The angular diameter is perpendicular to direction of flight, so foreshortening shouldn't be an issue, but I could be wrong about this.

  • $\begingroup$ Related to your post: stsci.edu/ftp/science/m87/press.txt $\endgroup$ – user108787 Aug 19 '16 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ If you define "angular diameter" as "the angle between light rays coming from opposite limbs of the planet", then the angular diameter of the planet will change. See relativistic aberration. $\endgroup$ – Michael Seifert Aug 19 '16 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ His apparent distance to the planet would be foreshortened as he approached the speed of light. The angular size of the planet is proportional to the distance for small angles. $\endgroup$ – Peter R Aug 19 '16 at 14:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MichaelSeifert So you're saying that, at the instant of acceleration, the planet's angular diameter will increase suddenly, to be consistent with the now foreshortened distance between the ship and the planet (from the ship's viewpoint)? $\endgroup$ – barrycarter Aug 19 '16 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ A youtube is worth 1000 words. $\endgroup$ – Keith McClary Oct 17 at 1:52
  1. The calculation of distance from angular diameter (in a given frame) is accurate. Therefore it decreases linearly if and only if the actual distance decreases linearly, if and only if you are traveling at a fixed velocity relative to the planet.

  2. Obviously the act of (instantaneous) acceleration can't change what you actually see. So the angular diameter you observe doesn't change. But the calculated distance to the planet depends not just on the observed angular diameter; it depends also on your velocity relative to the planet. After all, the light rays you're seeing left the planet some time ago, and you've got to correct for that.

  3. When you change frames, you will change your mind about when those light rays left the planet, so the calculation will change.

In more detail:

I. In a Fixed Frame:

It's easiest to imagine that you are standing still and the center of the planet is approaching you at some velocity $v$.

Suppose the diameter of the planet is $2A$. Suppose, at time $0$, that the light reaching you from the edge of the planet forms an angle $\theta$ with the light reaching you from the center of the planet. Set $X=Cos(\theta)$.

The light currently hitting your eye left the edge of the planet at some time $-T$ and has traveled a distance $T$ in the interim. So we have this picture, showing the distance to the edge and center of the planet at time $-T$:

enter image description here

This gives us two equations: $$D^2+A^2=T^2\qquad D/T=X$$ Solving, we get: $$D=AX/\sqrt{1+X^2}\qquad T=A/\sqrt{1+X^2}$$ Because the distance to the planet was $D$ at time $-T$, and because, in the interim, the planet has been traveling toward you at speed $v$, its current distance is $$D_0=D-Tv=A(X-v)/\sqrt{1+X^2} $$

2. Change of Frame.

Now instantly accelerate so that your new velocity (relative to your original frame) is $w$ instead of $v$. This changes the coordinates of the event $(D,T)$ to $$D'=(D-wT)/\sqrt{1+w^2}\qquad T'=(T-wD)/\sqrt{1+w^2}$$ and changes the relative velocity between you and the planet to $$v'=(v-w)/(1-vw)$$

This gives the current distance from you to the planet, calculated in the new frame: $$D_0'=D'-T'v'= D_0{\sqrt{1-w^2}\over 1-v w}$$

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think that's my actual question: does the angular diameter change suddenly before and after acceleration? I'm not convinced the act of acceleration can't change what I actually see. Can someone else confirm or source this? I think en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_aberration has something to do with it. $\endgroup$ – barrycarter Sep 25 '16 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ What you actually see depends entirely on the photons that arrive at your retina. Your decision to accelerate does not change the paths of those photons. $\endgroup$ – WillO Sep 25 '16 at 15:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well @michael-seifert appears to disagree in the comments to my question, so I'd like to get some confirmation/source. $\endgroup$ – barrycarter Sep 25 '16 at 15:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.