1
$\begingroup$

A bit rusty, tried using $E=mc^2$ to figure out how much kinetic energy would 1kg of mass convert to, and then work backwards to figure out what would be the final velocity of a 1kg mass having kinetic energy equivalent to 1kg mass as kinetic energy.

Not sure how correct this is but here it goes: $E = 1kg\times c^2$ is the (kinetic) energy equivalent of 1kg mass. I am hazy about the next step, 1kg mass having kinetic energy of $1kg\times c^2$ w.r.t. to a stationary point would appear to be moving at what (relativistic) speed? (not sure even if the first step is correct)

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

If you take a mass $m=1\:\rm kg$ and turn it straight into energy, by whatever means, then indeed you will get an energy $E=mc^2$ (a.k.a. its rest energy) out of it.

If you then use all of that energy to accelerate a second $1\:\rm kg$ mass, that second mass will definitely be accelerated to relativistic domains. This means that you cannot use the old relationship $E_\mathrm{kin}=\frac12 mv^2$ between the particle's velocity $v$ relative to its initial rest frame and its kinetic energy $E_\mathrm{kin}$. Instead, you need to use the relativistic version for the total energy, which reads $$ E=\gamma mc^2 = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}, $$ where $\gamma=1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$ is known as the Lorentz factor and reduces to $1$ at zero velocity (thereby giving the rest energy $E=mc^2$).

In your case, the second mass already has its rest energy, and you're doubling this, so $$ E=\gamma mc^2 = 2mc^2, $$ which then gives you the equation $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}=2$$ that you can solve for $v$ to give $v=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}c\approx 0.8660\,c$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.