0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand formula $(45.17)$ from this Feynman's lecture.

We know that $U=3PV$ for photon gas. Then Feynman concludes

$$\Big( \frac{ \partial U }{ \partial V } \Big)_{T} = 3P$$

It would be obvious if we knew

\begin{equation} \label{*} \Big( \frac{ \partial P }{ \partial V } \Big)_{T} = 0 \tag{*} \end{equation}

Equivalently, $P$ depends only on $T$ but not on $V$.

Question Why should one expect $\eqref{*}$ holds?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The Internal energy of a photon gas is given by $$ U=\frac{\pi^2k_B^4}{15 c^3 \hbar^3}V T^4.$$ If one rearranges the expression $U=3PV$ to get P one has: $$P=\frac{U}{3V}.$$ But from the first expression we know, that $U$ divided by $V$ is independent of $V$. So $$\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T=0.$$ EDIT: Since pressure is an intensive quanity it should not depend on an extensive quantity.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There are several equivalent formulations of my question. Why $U \sim V$? Why pressure is intensive quantity? I do not know answer for either of them. I was lost when I tried to read the chapter about it. Maybe it is a bad idea to think naively about it. But if one make volume of ideal gas twice bigger (isothermally), then $U$ is not twice bigger because the concentration is twice smaller. What happens for photon gas? Should I think that when you make the volume twice larger (isothermally), the walls of the box radiates new photons? $\endgroup$ – quinque Aug 17 '16 at 12:49
  • $\begingroup$ Pressure is allways an intensive quantity: see for example physics.stackexchange.com/questions/218614/… or references therein. To the photon gas: one can derive an expression for the internal engery density (u=U/V) by integrating over the Planck distribution for a blackbody. $\endgroup$ – N0va Aug 17 '16 at 15:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.