1
$\begingroup$

A popular explanation for the 5/2 fractional quantum hall plateau is that it can be understood as a Cooper pairing state of some neutral composite fermions. We know there are two characteristic features of superconductors, one is the perfect electrical conductivity; the other is the perfect diamagnetism. Since the composite fermions are neutral and effectively live in zero magnetic field, which is at least true at filling fraction 5/2 or 1/2, there can not be any true superconductivity. I know the perfect diamagnetism is translated to incompressibility for composite fermions so it explains why the pairing state is a qualified FQHE state. The question is: what does the perfect conductivity in a true superconductor correspond to in the composite fermion case? It is certainly not a perfect electrical conduction as composite fermions are neutral.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Some neutral superfluidity? $\endgroup$ – pathintegral Aug 13 '16 at 4:25
  • $\begingroup$ @pathintegral:I think that is true. But I want to know physically in terms of observable quantity what that superfluidity corresponds to. $\endgroup$ – Zhiqiang Wang Aug 17 '16 at 20:52
1
$\begingroup$

While the composite fermions are electrically neutral, they are charged under an emergent internal U(1) gauge field - the gauge field '$a$' used to implement the flux attachment. Working through the mapping, the physical electron current $j^e$ is related to the internal gauge field as

$$ j^\mu_{e} = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \rho} \partial_\nu a_\rho + \left(\frac{1}{4 \pi \ell_B^2}, 0, 0\right)$$

In particular, $\delta n_e = \frac{1}{4 \pi} b$, which is why 'flux expulsion' in the superconductor corresponds to incompressibility, as you mentioned.

This brings us to your question - what is the signature of dissipationless current in a CF-superconductor? Suppose we set up a persistent current of composite Fermions in the CF-superconductor. According to the London equations, we have

$$j_{CF} = - \frac{ n_{CF} e^2}{m_{CF}} a$$

We then use the relation $j^{i}_e = -\frac{1}{4 \pi} \epsilon^{ij} \partial_t a_j$ to write $j_e = \frac{m_{CF}}{ 4 \pi n_{CF} e^2} \hat{z} \times \partial_t j_{CF} $. On the other hand, we know that $j_e = \partial_t P_e$, where $P_e$ is the polarization density of the electrons. We conclude that

$$P_e = \Lambda^2 \, \hat{z} \times j_{CF} $$

where $\Lambda$ is the London penetration depth. Thus, the existence of persistent currents in a superconductor corresponds to the possibility of 'persistent polarization density' in the Hall fluid.

The possibility of a persistent polarization density is peculiar to a Hall phase. In a regular band insulator, if you polarize the material by displacing all the electrons slightly, the system will relax back, heating up in the process.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Then I think we can think about this persistent polarization density as the electron density polarization build up in the transverse direction of a Hall bar that gives the transverse Hall voltage, which is dissipation-less. $\endgroup$ – Zhiqiang Wang Sep 20 '16 at 0:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.