The chiral ring of the Coulomb branch of a 4D ${\cal N}=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory is given by the Casimirs of the vector multiplet scalars, and they don't have non-trivial relations; the Casimirs are always independent.

Also in Gaiotto's class of ${\cal N}=2$ non-Lagrangian theories, the chiral ring of the Coulomb branch doesn't (seem to) have relations.

Is it a general fact? If so, how can we deduce it from the $N=2$ supersymmetric algebras?

I was asked to clarify the definition of the Coulomb branch in non-Lagrangian theories; let's define them for $N=2$ SCFT by the fact that $SU(2)_R$ symmetry acts on the Coulomb branch operators trivially.


As far as I remember it goes something like this:

If ($g$) is a finite dimensional and a semi-simple Lie algebra with a "rank" ($n$) then the center $[Z(U(g))]$ should be isomorphic to the polynomial algebra ($K[C^i]$) over the base field of ($n$) variables ($C^i$) where ($i=1, 2, 3, ... , n$). The number of algebraically independent Casimirs is equal to the rank.

So if your question is why are Casimirs independent, that's the best answer I can think of.


protected by ACuriousMind Dec 3 '15 at 23:00

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.