16
$\begingroup$

Most optics texts will mention that alkali metals can become transparent in the near ultraviolet in the sections on reflections from metals, plasma frequency, and electron density. I remembered this again just now when I saw Table XXVII in Born and Wolf's Principles of Optics (6th ed.) and saw that the critical wavelength for cesium has an observed value of 4400Å, which is plain old blue light that we see all the time. The table caption says:

The critical wavelength $\lambda_c$ below which the alkali metals become transparent, and above which they are opaque and highly reflective.

...alkali metals become transparent... This sounds like it would be quite amazing to actually see - metal that becomes transparent in blue or even near-UV light! I would like to see this - even an image published somewhere - anything! Or if it is actually not really true as stated in Born & Wolf, what else is there to consider?

I think I've seen pieces of cesium under mineral oil, and plenty of pictures on the internet and it just looks like metal. Definitely not transparent for blue light in bulk from what I've seen.

Is the 4400Å value wrong, or am I misunderstanding something, or would the cesium still need to be relatively thin or perhaps very cold to be detectably transparent in blue visible light? Are there any examples of this surprising effect due to the low plasma frequency (large critical wavelength) that can be linked to or shown here?

Is there some data I can see that's not behind a paywall? A photo of blue light passing through bulk cesium metal?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think while the reflectivity goes down at those ultraviolet wavelengths, this doesn't only mean that transparency goes up. It also means absorption increases. Im guessing that this transparency is only visible for very thin pieces of alkali metal. $\endgroup$
    – KF Gauss
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @uhoh, I'm not saying that anything is being made up. I'm just saying the transparency goes up (reflectivity goes down), but so absorption also increases. They are not mutually exclusive. $\endgroup$
    – KF Gauss
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ This is a good place for such information: refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main&book=Cs&page=Smith $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Commented Mar 5, 2021 at 1:28

4 Answers 4

5
$\begingroup$

Simple metals are transparent at short wavelengths. It is maybe a problem that physicists do not usually write what their samples look like (chemists often note color and smell). I found this old paper from 1931 that starts:

It is a matter of common knowledge that an ordinary gold leaf appears green by transmitted light while silver appears blue.

I did not know this "common knowledge" about silver, such thin foils are not common. I have seen it for gold, but I cannot find photos. It would be very illustrative to have a photo of transparent films of the alkali metals but those are a bit difficult to prepare. I found a movie about alkali metal dissolved in ammonia: first blue (solvated electrons are blue), then "bronze".

There should be some gold leaf around, I will look for it and try to make a photo.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ @uhoh you may want to take a look at journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.2840 $\endgroup$
    – KF Gauss
    Commented Feb 15, 2019 at 5:01
  • $\begingroup$ I'm still left wondering if Born & Wolf are correct; alkali metals transparent to UV and cesium transparent to blue? I think that the incredibly thin gold leaf is not helpful for two reasons 1) it's gold, not an alkali metal, 2) gold is definitely not transparent and gold leaf leaks a bit of light only when it is thinner than the skin-depth, and that would be true for metals in general. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Mar 13, 2019 at 11:04
1
$\begingroup$

We used cesium based atomic line filters in an air to air laser communications system, but the wavelength was near 850 nm (near infrared).

But a quick search finding this suggests Cs is also useful in the blue spectrum, so possibly UV.

Atomic line filters heat the Cs to create a vapor state in the Cs, trapped between two optical windows that admit light.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The particular narrow atomic lines you mention are (generally) only seen in atomic cesium vapor. My question is about metallic cesium, and the optical property I'm talking about is related to the conduction electrons that occur only in the metal. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jul 25, 2016 at 14:28
1
$\begingroup$

Yes, this is true under certain circumstances, of course. I will keep things simple and say that the best way to answer your question is to look at the refractive index and transmittance spectrum of caesium. For that, I invite you to visit this link

https://refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main&book=Cs&page=Smith

Where you can find these data for many materials. But, concentrating caesium, if we look at the refractive index (figure below) enter image description here We see that $ n=k $ at around $ \lambda = 410 \text{nm} $, which means that the plasma wavelength is 410 nm. Just to be clear on how I made this conclusion, the plasma wavelength is defined when the real part of the relative permettivity $ \epsilon_r $ is equal to 0. How does that relate to the refractive index? Well, the relative permettivity is nothing but the square of the complex refractive index, meaning $$ \begin{align} \epsilon_r & = {\widetilde n}^2 \\ & = {(n +ik)}^2 \\ & = (n^2 - k^2) +i2nk \end{align} $$ We can clearly see that $\operatorname{Re}(\epsilon_r) =0$ when $ n = k $.

Now, concerning the transparency, knowing the refractive index, one can calculate the transmittance of thin films using Transfer Matrix method, which relies on Fresnel coefficients (out of the scope of this discussion). The website offers a small tool that calculates the transmittance (figure below). enter image description here I did it for a 50 nm thick caesium layer. You can see that the transmittance drastically increases for wavelengths below 500 nm. Of course, if you take thicker layers, the transmittance decreases. You need to remember the absorption coefficient is directly related to $ k $ and at the plasma frequency $ k = n $ but is not 0. Therefore, the electromagnetic wave will still be attenuated when passing through the caesium. So taking a thinner layer will insure that a decent amount of light will still go through. Now I invite you to check the website and check the refractive index and transmittance of other Alkali metals.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer and welcome to Stack Exchange! So far what I see in your answer is that a table of numbers is referenced, and these numbers, if they are accurate, indicate that at least relatively thin layers (tens of microns) of pure Cesium should be transparent. So we haven't moved very far from the question, which also cites a table of numbers that if they are accurate, indicate that at least relatively thin layers (tens of microns) of pure Cesium should be transparent. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Dec 22, 2020 at 21:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm going to continue to hold out for some evidence that it really is transparent, a measured transmission spectrum for example. Tables can be wrong, especially complex index of refraction in the UV because in the past UV ellipsometers were few and far between and various dispersion models were used instead to fill in the gaps. n&k table generation often involved some real hand-waving, and newer tables copy from older tables. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Dec 22, 2020 at 21:04
1
$\begingroup$

It is absolutely accurate that two continuous functions (the magnitude and imaginary component of the optical index, in this case) will cross if they trend in opposite directions. Therefore, there must be a very specific wavelength at which the the real and imaginary components are exactly equal.

There are many reasons you may not see the transparency for practical reasons. Metal purity being one. Phonon scattering being another...

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer! Transparency requires the imaginary part of the index of refractive index to be essentially zero, not to be equal to the real part. Yes there are many practical reasons that a crystalline material may not be transparent, one would have to produce the cesium sample with a similar purity to other polycrystalline materials that are transparent first before checking, ideally by growing a Cs crystal rather than just using a random piece of four-nines pure metal from the chemistry lab. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Mar 5, 2021 at 1:30
  • $\begingroup$ The crossing of $n$ and $k$ at 410 nm in the other answer seems to be just a clever way to find one value of the plasma wavelength; the attenuation length (either amplitude or intensity, not sure which) is about 1 wavelength when they cross. Cesium isn't supposed to become potentially transparent until red or near infrared. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Mar 5, 2021 at 1:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.