1
$\begingroup$

Maybe my question is just a blunder. Consider Compton interaction: $e^{-}+\gamma \rightarrow e^{-}+\gamma$. There are two Feynman diagrams related to this process to the lowest order of $\alpha$.

Now consider $e^{-}+e^{+} \rightarrow \mu^{-}+\mu ^{+}$. I think here there are two different diagrams as well. First, connect electron and positron to a virtual photon (propagator) with two free points that can be connected to a fermion called $A$ and $B$. I guess one can connect $A$ to muon or to anti-muon so there are two different Feynman diagrams for this process to the lowest order of the electron charge. However, I checked this interaction on QFT reference books such as Peskin (Chapter 5) and they have just calculated one of this diagrams. What is the problem?

Note: There are other diagrams too.

First one: enter image description here

Second one: enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you draw the diagrams you're talking about? $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jul 15 '16 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ @knzhou I edited my question $\endgroup$ – Kiarash Jul 15 '16 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ Put the arrows on the fermion lines and you should see the problem with your first diagram ;) $\endgroup$ – Noiralef Jul 15 '16 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ look at this page inspirehep.net/record/798415/plots $\endgroup$ – anna v Jul 15 '16 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ @annav done! seems there is only 1 diagram in the lowest order but I don't know why the other (maybe others) isn't allowed $\endgroup$ – Kiarash Jul 15 '16 at 18:15
2
$\begingroup$

The diagrams you are drawing are not allowed. In the last one you have an electron going into an muon, by the emission of a photon. Try to isolate that part. If it works one way, it should also work the other way - a muon should be able to decay into an electron by the emission of a photon. This cannot happen. Muons decay to electrons in the weak interaction, not QED.

In the first one, you have the same problem, plus an additional one: you don't obey charge conservation in your vertices. An electron (charge -1) cannot become an anti-muon (charge 1), no matter how many photons it emits.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If you're only considering QED, there is only one vertex for this interaction -- electron and positron annhilate to photon, photon pair-produces muon and antimuon. Any electron, photon, muon vertex will have flavor conservation issues.

If you're not JUST considering QED, there is a second diagram, identical to the first, with the photon replaced with a $Z^{0}$. For low energies, the contribution of this one is small, compared to the first, because it's suppressed with factors of $m_{Z}$

Basically, your proposed vertex of $e^{-} \rightarrow \gamma + \mu^{-}$ violates symmetries that you haven't yet encountered in Peskin and Schroder.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I edited my question $\endgroup$ – Kiarash Jul 15 '16 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ @KNP: yes, in your edit, you include an $e^{-}$ hitting a vertex, and becoming a $\mu^{-}$ and a $\gamma$. This is forbidden by flavor conservation. $\endgroup$ – Jerry Schirmer Jul 15 '16 at 20:02
0
$\begingroup$

The two diagrams you draw are all wrong, for the vortex is determined by Lagrangian.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest to add more details. $\endgroup$ – user259412 Jul 15 '16 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. None of them are true. I want to know why they are not allowed? (or why they are zero?) $\endgroup$ – Kiarash Jul 15 '16 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.