6
$\begingroup$

When we lick a finger and put it up in the air, the side that is cooled is the one facing the direction from which the wind is blowing. But consider this, if we take a cross section of the finger, ie look at it from above, we see the wind blowing at our finger and our finger can be considered to be a cylinder.

From examples like vortex street forming around a cylindrical object, we know that a low pressure exists behind the object. Lower pressure would normally help saliva evaporate faster and thus from this point of view one would expect that the side of the finger away from the wind would evaporate faster.

What is the explanation to this?

$\endgroup$

4 Answers 4

3
$\begingroup$

First, the reason why the finger becomes more wind-sensitive with some saliva isn't that the saliva evaporates but because the saliva, or water, is a good thermal conductor. The finger has to be warmer than the air so the heat flows from the finger to the air and a good thermal conductor such as saliva helps this flux to take place.

Second, because it's the temperature and not evaporation that matters, we must care about the temperature of the air because this is what is actually cooling the finger. Without any wind, the human body – which is warmer than the air – creates a thin layer of warmed air in the very vicinity of the skin which acts as a thermal insulator and slows down the cooling of the human body.

But the wind disrupts this insulating layer on the front side of the finger and the cooler air gets directly in contact with the finger (or the with saliva on the finger). The air on the opposite side of the finger is either stuck in vortices – that may keep on recycling some warmer air (previously heated by the finger), or if there are no vortices, the air on the opposite side of the finger is still warmer because it was heated up by the finger "recently" when the air was flowing around the finger.

$\endgroup$
16
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding your first paragraph, I don't believe that placing a good conductor between two objects will cause a greater heat flux than direct contact between the two objects. The intervening conductor will introduce some resistance to heat flow that wasn't present otherwise. $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Jul 8, 2016 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ Not evaporation? Doesn't it work in warm air? What's your reference? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2016 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ I think the thermal sensitivity disappears in the air of the temperature basically equal to the body temperature. Such a temperature of no sensitivity would exist even if the evaporation played a role. There would always be a temperature at which the warming of the finger by the surrounding air would cancel the cooling of the finger by the evaporation. The only question would be what is the temperature - equivalently, what's the ratio of the importance of the cooling by contact and cooling by evaporation. ... I don't have a reference. The very purpose of this page is to become one. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2016 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ Above this temperature, the effect gets reversed. If you have a hot air flowing from an oven, the front side of the finger will surely feel warmer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2016 at 6:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @LubošMotl: I have a lot of respect for your good answers, but I think you're mistaken on this one. People whose body temperature is 37C live (and generate body heat) in 40C places where fortunately the humidity is low. They shed the excess calories by evaporation (unless I'm badly mistaken :) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 12, 2016 at 12:02
1
$\begingroup$

The percentage by which the pressure lowers on the leeward side of your finger is minuscule, so it barely affects the rate of evaporation.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ But on the upwind side there is a thin boundary layer and air flow over that, carrying away evaporated H2O, much more than on the wind-shadow side, no? (I was in M.E. at MIT. Pp 420 in Rohsenow and Choi, Heat, Mass, and Momentum Transfer discusses wet-bulb thermometers. In particular there is a mass-transfer convection term $h_D$. Also pp 384 talks about boundary layers in convection. This doesn't discuss upwind/downwind issues, but I think basic aerodynamics does that.) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 12, 2016 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I assume there's higher wind flow, and thus more evaporation, on the upwind side. I don't know enough fluid dynamics to support this, though. The web bulb/dry bulb thermometer method of determining humidity shows that evaporation can lower temperatures by several degrees C. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 12, 2016 at 13:09
  • $\begingroup$ But by that logic even if the pressure drop is miniscule, there is increased pressure on the front side; this can cause increased evaporation on the backside. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2016 at 16:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Right. There's the increased evaporation from lower pressure on the back side, and there's the increased evaporation from higher wind speed on the front side. One can easily find resources which confirm both of these effects. You might have to search the literature and find numerical values to figure out which effect is larger. (Or you could just determine this experimentally by holding up a wet finger on a windy day.) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2016 at 17:18
0
$\begingroup$

I think is somewhat similar to when we blow on our soup to make it cold, or not? The fluid threads lower the pressure on the broth's surface and the water passes from the liquid to the gaseous state more easily due to the lower pressure. Evaporation subtracts energy and cools the soup.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is the opposite statement of Lubos Motl's answer. Do you see? $\endgroup$
    – jaromrax
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ I do not know really I am so sorry: on science I "play by ear" being a musician (a trumpet player) youtube.com/watch?v=a_pePlo3j0I $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 13, 2019 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ In any case, beside my amatorial approach, In effect it seems to be on the opposite side of Lubos Motl's answer's. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 13, 2019 at 15:17
0
$\begingroup$

What you are feeling is actually an increase in heat flux away from your finger, due to an increase in convective heat transfer from locally impinging flow in the wind direction, along with a major boost in convective heat transfer from the evaporating saliva film.

I'll explain these two phenomena below.

There is impingement flow against your finger coming from the wind. This results in a locally thin boundary layer on the site of impingement, thus increasing convective heat transfer because thinner boundary layers provide less resistance to heat flow.

Furthermore, when you lick your finger, you create a thin evaporating film which increases convective heat transfer even more; a thin layer of evaporating fluid provides a small resistance (it's a thin layer) plus a large latent heat of evaporation required to evaporate. Your skin provides this latent heat.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Did you read the answer of Lubos Motl? How do you oppose his opinion? $\endgroup$
    – jaromrax
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 14:59
  • $\begingroup$ @jaromrax, my answer is similar to Lubos Motl's, but I think he failed to highlight the main reason the finger loses heat is due a thin saliva film which has a small conduction resistance. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 14, 2019 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ It is evident there are 2 different opinions. Arguments would make it clear, not statements. $\endgroup$
    – jaromrax
    Commented Feb 17, 2019 at 10:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.