0
$\begingroup$

When we consider force balance on a static fluid element which is cut along some arbitrary plane as shown, we start by saying that the fluid is static and hence there is no shear stress along the plane. And from there we define the pressure as acting normal to the plane, and go on to derive the hydrostatic condition of pressures at a point. Fluid Element in Hydrostatic condition

My question is, where does the assumption that the shear stress is zero come from? Is it purely due to observation that a fluid flows continuously under any applied shear, or is there a fundamental basis?

Suppose, say we do not initially let the shear forces vanish along the plane of the element. If we take a non-zero value of the shear force and do a force balance on the element, we do not reach the hydrostatic condition since the shear values are not zero now. How can we proceed now to prove that the shear stress is zero?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your question is a bit unclear. A diagram would help. $\endgroup$ – Lelouch Jul 6 '16 at 10:57
2
$\begingroup$

One definition of a fluid is a substance that continually deforms under shear stress. So if we find a fluid that is static, i.e. not continually deforming, then it cannot have any shear stress by definition.

Note that the condition "continually deforms under shear stress" depends on the time period of observation. For example, on a timescale of hundreds of years, glass is a fluid that deforms continuously under shear stress. On a timescale of seconds, glass resists shear stress.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ When we consider force balance on a static fluid element which is cut along some arbitrary plane, we start by saying that the fluid is static and hence there is no shear stress along that plane. And from there we define the pressure on the face of the plane as acting normal to the plane, and go on to derive the hydrostatic condition of pressures at a point. My question is, where does the assumption that the shear stress is zero come from? Is it purely due to observation that a fluid flows continuously under any applied shear, or is there a fundamental basis? $\endgroup$ – Haridev V Jul 6 '16 at 11:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By empirical observation, some materials can support shear stress in their static state, whereas others cannot. We have chosen the term 'fluid' to describe those materials which cannot. $\endgroup$ – Sergei Patiakin Jul 6 '16 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ @SergeiPatiakin I think your comment above is the correct answer! $\endgroup$ – Diracology Jul 6 '16 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ The statement that shear stress in a static fluid element is always zero arises only from observation, and is there no fundamental proof to it? $\endgroup$ – Haridev V Jul 6 '16 at 12:08
  • $\begingroup$ The fact that the fluid element is not deforming will conclude whether the shear force is zero or not. If the shear stress is T then T = M du/dy. For a static fluid, du/dy is zero and hence T is zero. $\endgroup$ – Lelouch Jul 6 '16 at 12:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.