4
$\begingroup$

I have been attempting to find a general formulae for dark matter scattering off of protons (or other baryonic matter) but with no avail. I took a quick look at solar capture of dark matter but the capture rate seems to be usually done for a very specific dark matter model.

So, what I would like to have is simply the chance of there being scattering given some distribution of baryonic matter $f_b$, dark matter $f_{DM}$ and some given scattering cross-section $\sigma$ that we assume to be a free parameter.

One can assume WIMP dark matter.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What model of dark matter particle are you assuming? I myself am a fan of non-baryonic particles as candidates for dark matter. Given that it would only interact with other particles via gravity, there would be no scattering off other matter. So please clarify your choice, since it is very relevant. $\endgroup$
    – Jim
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Can assume WIMP. I would like the scattering cross-section to be a free parameter (in the case of no scattering, just set the free parameter to 0). At most, I would do first order approximation with $\sigma=a+b\cdot v$. At any rate, I've modified my answer: scattering via weak interaction $\endgroup$
    – OTH
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 13:02

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

There will be as many formulae as models, because it depends what one supposes dark matter is composed of.

If WIMP

In particle physics and astrophysics, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, or WIMPs, are among the last hypothetical particle physics candidates for dark matter. The term “WIMP” is given to a dark matter particle that was produced by falling out of thermal equilibrium with the hot dense plasma of the early universe, although it is often used to refer to any dark matter candidate that interacts with standard particles via a force similar in strength to the weak nuclear force.Its name comes from the fact that obtaining the correct abundance of dark matter today via thermal production requires a self-annihilation cross section of ⟨ σ v ⟩ ≃ 3 × 10 ^− 26 c m^ 3 s^ − 1 which is roughly what is expected for a new particle in the 100 GeV mass range that interacts via the electroweak force. Because supersymmetric extensions of the standard model of particle physics readily predict a new particle with these properties, this apparent coincidence is known as the “WIMP miracle”, and a stable supersymmetric partner has long been a prime WIMP candidate

There cannot be one formula for the cross section as there are many candidate particle that may model the behavior.

The composition of dark matter remains uncertain. Possibilities include dense baryonic (interacts with electromagnetic force) matter and non-baryonic matter (interacts with its surroundings only through gravity).

There is cold dark matter hypothesis, hot dark matter hypothesis, warm dark matter hypothesis, and each candidate particles will have their special interaction cross section.

Edit:

The cross section will be a function of the mass of the particle and of the type of interactions it can have in order to have the appropriate observed self annihilation cross section. To show an example of the complexity here is for a hypothetical WIMP the WIMP nucleon cross section as a function of its mass as reported by the CDMS experiment :

wimp

Here is a dissertation dealing with these limits.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi anna v. Thanks for the answer; what I meant was modeling the scattering in a model independent way so one can assume the cross-section as a (given) free parameter. E.g. $\sigma=a+b\cdot v^2$. I edited the question to clarify. I could also start another question for this, since I think it would be a good idea to document this question & answer as well. $\endgroup$
    – OTH
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 12:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.