Imagine a particle with energy $E$ heading towards a potential step with height $V_0$ where $E<V_0$. The particle's wave function is oscillatory before the boundary and exponentially decaying in and after the boundary. However, there is still a small probability the particle can be found in the 'forbidden' region. Is this quantum tunnelling? I read that for a potential step like this, there is a 100% reflection so I'm getting getting the indication that there is no tunnelling.

  • $\begingroup$ You're looking at a stationary state, so you can't say the particle is "heading toward" or "tunneling" or doing anything. Once you make time-dependent wavepackets, you find that the particle 'bleeds into' the barrier a little when it hits it but then completely reflects off, so there's no tunneling. $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jun 24 '16 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ When there's genuine tunneling, the resulting wavepacket will have a component on the other side of the barrier for $t \to \infty$. $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jun 24 '16 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ So even a particle 'bleeding' even just a little does not count as tunnelling? I think what I have read was about formulating a plane wave. How do I construct the wavepackets then? $\endgroup$ – Ayumu Kasugano Jun 24 '16 at 22:01

It is quantum tunneling if the step potential has finite length. In this case, the continuity conditions on both sides of the step potential will show you that there is a nonvanishing amplitude behind the potential. If the potential has infinite length, there is no space to tunnel into.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.