6
$\begingroup$

Take a real Grassmann variable, by which I mean $\theta=\theta^*$. We have

$$\int d\theta~ \theta =1,\qquad \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\theta=1$$

If I define the conjugation of Grassmann variables to invert their order, $$(\eta\theta)^*= \theta^*\eta^*,$$ should I then have $$(d\theta\theta)^*=\theta^*d\theta^*~?$$ But this means

$$(\int d\theta~\theta)^*=1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad\int \theta^* d\theta^*=-\int d\theta^* ~\theta^*=1,$$

so if $\theta=\theta^*$, I should have $$d\theta^*=-d\theta.$$ The same can be found for the derivative of $\theta$.

Is this the usual convention to take, or should I instead choose $$(d\theta \theta)^*=d\theta^* \theta^*~?$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Yes. OP is right. There is a minus. Since by convention the complex conjugation obeys

$$ (z w)^{\ast} ~=~ w^{\ast}z^{\ast}~=~(-1)^{|z|~|w|} z^{\ast}w^{\ast} \tag{1}$$

for any two supernumbers $z$, $w$ (of definite Grassmann parities $|z|$,$|w|$), we should also have

$$ (A f)^{\ast} ~=~(-1)^{|A| ~|f|} A^{\ast}f^{\ast} \tag{2}$$

for complex conjugation of an operator $A$ and a function $f$, cf. e.g. Refs. 1 & 2. Eq. (2) reduces to eq. (1) if $A$ is a left multiplication operator. It is easy to check that eq. (2) implies that$^{1}$

$$ \left(\frac{\partial_L}{\partial z}\right)^{\ast}~\stackrel{(2)}{=}~ (-1)^{|z|} \frac{\partial_L}{\partial (z^{\ast})}.\tag{3}$$

Since Berezin integration is the same as left differentiation

$$ \int \!d\theta ~=~\frac{\partial_L}{\partial \theta}, \qquad \int \!d\theta^{\ast} ~=~\frac{\partial_L}{\partial (\theta^{\ast})},\tag{4} $$

we derive that complex conjugation of Grassmann-odd differentiation produces a minus

$$ \left( \int \!d\theta \right)^{\ast} ~\stackrel{(4)}{=}~\left(\frac{\partial_L}{\partial \theta}\right)^{\ast} ~\stackrel{(3)}{=}~-\frac{\partial_L}{\partial (\theta^{\ast})} ~\stackrel{(4)}{=}- \int \!d\theta^{\ast}.\tag{5} $$

References:

  1. B. DeWitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992; eq. (2.2.19).

  2. S.J. Gates, M.T. Grisaru, M. Rocek & W. Siegel, Superspace, or One thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry, arXiv:hep-th/0108200; eq. (3.1.9).

--

$^{1}$ The subscript $L$ ($R$) denotes left (right) differentiation, i.e. acting from left (right), respectively. For completeness, let us mention that left and right differentiation are connected via the formula

$$ \frac{\partial_L f}{\partial z}~=~(-1)^{(|f|+1)|z|}\frac{\partial_R f}{\partial z},\tag{6} $$

so that complex conjugation satisfies

$$\left(\frac{\partial_L}{\partial z}\right)^{\ast}f~\stackrel{(3)+(6)}{=}~ (-1)^{|z||f|} \frac{\partial_R f}{\partial (z^{\ast})}, \qquad \left(\frac{\partial_R}{\partial z}\right)^{\ast}f~\stackrel{(3)+(6)}{=}~ (-1)^{|z||f|} \frac{\partial_L f}{\partial (z^{\ast})}.\tag{7} $$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Notes for later: $\langle v, w \rangle~:=~ v^{\dagger}w~=~\langle w, v \rangle^{\ast}$; $\langle v, Aw \rangle~=~\langle A^{\dagger}v, w \rangle$; $(AB)^{\dagger}~=~B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger}$; $A^{\dagger}~=~(A^T)^{\ast}~=~(A^{\ast})^T$; $(AB)^T~=~(-1)^{|A||B|}B^TA^T$; $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Nov 18, 2017 at 14:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.